Sundancer390 I don't follow your vague references you say “follow the lexicon” what does that mean? How are we supposed to know?
lex⋅i⋅con /ˈlɛksɪˌkɒn, -kən/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [lek-si-kon, -kuhn] Show IPA –noun, plural lex⋅i⋅ca /ˈlɛksɪkə/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [lek-si-kuh] Show IPA , lex⋅i⋅cons. 1. a wordbook or dictionary, esp. of Greek, Latin, or Hebrew. 2. the vocabulary of a particular language, field, social class, person, etc. 3. inventory or record: unparalleled in the lexicon of human relations. 4. Linguistics. a. the total inventory of morphemes in a given language. b. the inventory of base morphemes plus their combinations with derivational morphemes.
AND…… on friday you stated (see below)
what are the 3 inputs? What do you mean by outputs?
How are we to know what the heck your talking about? numbers are derived from data mining
last night i was looking for a 6-9 pt gap based on 3 inputs and we got a 11 pt gap
the same 3 inputs gives me a 13-17 pt gap potential given the closing setup, the way to read this output is the closing conditions of the market are fertile for above average volatility of the following open
we have a defined max. containment point on the upside and we also have a max. containment point on the downside given the setup on the weekly. The weekly has been broken and successfully back tested. http://www.flickr.com/photos/47091634@N04/43590…
what we have is the ingredients for a sideways market until either the Max. containment point is broken on the monthly or the weekly on the downside
For those wandering why the rejection came @ 1150 might be interested in this chart http://www.flickr.com/photos/47091634@N04/43590… the structure supporting asset inflation has been broken & back tested once. expect more dancing with this structure before a break down occurs
i suppose I like your charts and numb'ers but
what is data mining?
in other words you are not goin to tell us your “secret”?
you could be a “false positive” front of the masonic lodge who is to spread confusion?
you'll find in your discovery process that a certain numerical sequence correlates to all the controlling trendlines in the market
bensjoyce that was in response to the divine ritual of the stock market co-relational to the macro
you won't see me divulge how i come up with a specific numb-er as it comes out of data mining and i'm not going to write out a manual calculation
if you don't like my charts and numb-ers, please ignore me
I knew there were a few people here that had both their eyes open…
yes Wolf in the situation room is just one of many that plays an important role, he plays the role well with the full beard all silver in color
SOLedad also plays an important role
There's also this clown named SHEPARD on FOX news, yes a shepard leading the dumb sheep to the butcher house and a FOX telling the truth, lol
Sundancer390 I don't follow your vague references you say “follow the lexicon” what does that mean? How are we supposed to know?
lex⋅i⋅con /ˈlɛksɪˌkɒn, -kən/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [lek-si-kon, -kuhn] Show IPA
–noun, plural lex⋅i⋅ca /ˈlɛksɪkə/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [lek-si-kuh] Show IPA , lex⋅i⋅cons. 1. a wordbook or dictionary, esp. of Greek, Latin, or Hebrew.
2. the vocabulary of a particular language, field, social class, person, etc.
3. inventory or record: unparalleled in the lexicon of human relations.
4. Linguistics. a. the total inventory of morphemes in a given language.
b. the inventory of base morphemes plus their combinations with derivational morphemes.
AND…… on friday you stated (see below)
what are the 3 inputs? What do you mean by outputs?
How are we to know what the heck your talking about?
numbers are derived from data mining
last night i was looking for a 6-9 pt gap based on 3 inputs and we got a 11 pt gap
the same 3 inputs gives me a 13-17 pt gap potential given the closing setup, the way to read this output is the closing conditions of the market are fertile for above average volatility of the following open
we have a defined max. containment point on the upside and we also have a max. containment point on the downside given the setup on the weekly. The weekly has been broken and successfully back tested.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/47091634@N04/43590…
what we have is the ingredients for a sideways market until either the Max. containment point is broken on the monthly or the weekly on the downside
Are you implying that Wolf and the Situation Room is somehow constructed to lead the view to a predetermined conclusion ?
NO!
What is the line that it's hitting?
For those wandering why the rejection came @ 1150 might be interested in this chart
http://www.flickr.com/photos/47091634@N04/43590…
the structure supporting asset inflation has been broken & back tested once.
expect more dancing with this structure before a break down occurs
more insane pointless bullshit