BTW CNBC said 129,000 on tv now its 125, 000 🙂
ah, and there's rub, yes? most economists, real ones who aren't bought and paid for by the establishment, say the unemployment rate is more likely at 18%. Esp because so many people have just given up looking and are no longer drawing unemployment
LOL… yeah, that shows about 17% or 22% as the real unemployment numbers.
http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/unemp…
The question is… do you even believe those numbers to be accurate? It's probably worst then that in reality.
Well, this country is getting more and more closer to becoming just like the Soviet Union, nothing surprise me anymore.
Hey, in the Soviet Union everybody had a job, a fact much admired by PBO, I'm afraid.
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
“Among the marginally attached, there were 1.2 million discouragedworkers in June, up by 414,000 from a year earlier”
Oh, OK… I just seen 125,000 on the front page of cnbc.com. I guess they quoted it wrong?
129,000 to be exact 🙂
BTW CNBC said 129,000 on tv now its 125, 000 🙂
ah, and there's rub, yes? most economists, real ones who aren't bought and paid for by the establishment, say the unemployment rate is more likely at 18%. Esp because so many people have just given up looking and are no longer drawing unemployment
LOL… yeah, that shows about 17% or 22% as the real unemployment numbers.
http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/unemp…
The question is… do you even believe those numbers to be accurate? It's probably worst then that in reality.
Well, this country is getting more and more closer to becoming just like the Soviet Union, nothing surprise me anymore.
Hey, in the Soviet Union everybody had a job, a fact much admired by PBO, I'm afraid.
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
“Among the marginally attached, there were 1.2 million discouraged
workers in June, up by 414,000 from a year earlier”
Oh, OK… I just seen 125,000 on the front page of cnbc.com. I guess they quoted it wrong?
129,000 to be exact 🙂