I sure wish they would hit that level and get it over with. This is as boring as watching paint dry…
co-relational controlling TL on the 60 min setup is almost complete1-2-3 dance with the TLSPX 1103.69 1/26/10SPX 1071.59 1/29/10= 32.1
1-2-3 dance with the TLSPX 1116.66 3/4/10SPX 1148.26 3/10/10=31.6
1148.76 co-relational
http://www.flickr.com/photos/47091634@N04/44221…
Thank you very much !
http://cfe.cboe.com/Products/Spec_VT.aspx
So there is no April. LOL
The stuff I don't understand goes on forever 🙂
Muchas gracias.
679.75
His model works best under lower levels of volatility.
Thanks!
His /ES numbers will be switching to June.
By Opex, the /ES and $SPX should have parity i.e. no difference between the futures price and cash price. The new June contract will have a several-point (usually 3-4 if memory serves) premium over the cash price.
I sure wish they would hit that level and get it over with. This is as boring as watching paint dry…
co-relational controlling TL on the 60 min setup is almost complete
1-2-3 dance with the TL
SPX 1103.69 1/26/10
SPX 1071.59 1/29/10
= 32.1
1-2-3 dance with the TL
SPX 1116.66 3/4/10
SPX 1148.26 3/10/10
=31.6
1148.76 co-relational
http://www.flickr.com/photos/47091634@N04/44221…
Thank you very much !
http://cfe.cboe.com/Products/Spec_VT.aspx
So there is no April. LOL
The stuff I don't understand goes on forever 🙂
Muchas gracias.
679.75
His model works best under lower levels of volatility.
Thanks!
His /ES numbers will be switching to June.
By Opex, the /ES and $SPX should have parity i.e. no difference between the futures price and cash price. The new June contract will have a several-point (usually 3-4 if memory serves) premium over the cash price.