Ahhh… but, according to his article nothing in the universe is a straight line. Meaning 3 months to another 3 months isn’t accurate. Instead one should look for the next octave multiplier of it. So if the first 3 months was octave 1 or “Do-” then you would look to use “Re-” for you next target.
Which would be “Do-” by 1/8, or the factor 1.125… which means you would times 3 months by 1.125 to reach the next probably date. I think that’s what he’s trying to say? This assumes an “ascending” octave. If it was a “descending” octave the you would time “Do-” by Ti- 0.9375 or 15/16… make sense?
T theory is the basis of for every action there is an equal reaction, based in Time, not Price.
ie: if an index goes down 3 months, it will go up for the following 3, again…in Time
the chart above may be a little confusing.
I have learned a corollary in that, if a T refuses to complete an
equal reaction, it will flip into a totally opposite direction, still fulfilling
the time period. [translation, A T may be correct in time, but totally wrong in whether it’s a HIGH or LOW)
He doesn’t post here using Disqus Gerb as he works as a math teacher (probably english too?) in Iran during the daytime. Plus the time zone is different too.
Ahhh… but, according to his article nothing in the universe is a straight line. Meaning 3 months to another 3 months isn’t accurate. Instead one should look for the next octave multiplier of it. So if the first 3 months was octave 1 or “Do-” then you would look to use “Re-” for you next target.
Which would be “Do-” by 1/8, or the factor 1.125… which means you would times 3 months by 1.125 to reach the next probably date. I think that’s what he’s trying to say? This assumes an “ascending” octave. If it was a “descending” octave the you would time “Do-” by Ti- 0.9375 or 15/16… make sense?
T theory is the basis of for every action there is an equal reaction, based in Time, not Price.
ie: if an index goes down 3 months, it will go up for the following 3, again…in Time
the chart above may be a little confusing.
I have learned a corollary in that, if a T refuses to complete an
equal reaction, it will flip into a totally opposite direction, still fulfilling
the time period. [translation, A T may be correct in time, but totally wrong in whether it’s a HIGH or LOW)
possibly. the article harmonizes with T theory
As I stated earlier, every movement of energy generates opposing movement of energy or “polar opposite“
You should try to make some T charts with different “octaves” as Ali explains. Maybe you’ll discover a pattern?
ah. gotcha.
i’ve been educating myself a bit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLX9ChtWBGo
He doesn’t post here using Disqus Gerb as he works as a math teacher (probably english too?) in Iran during the daytime. Plus the time zone is different too.
take a deep breath, eat a spoonful of honey.
and chant
*tops are rounded, tops are rounded*
LOL
Yeah… sorry about that. Getting too excited as a bear I guess. LOL
It’s almost MidJanuary.
http://s10.postimage.org/l2silf5e1/jan.png
it’s getting exciting.
love the Ali (guest?) commentary.
makes it hard to find the comment area.
-Gerb
Did you mean 1480 rather than 1380 ?