Thursday, September 24, 2026
Home Blog Page 113

Oil glut dampens Iran’s hopes for big cash flows as sanctions lift – Washington Post

0

[ad_1]


An Iranian oil worker bikes through the Tehran oil refinery in December 2014. (Vahid Salemi/AP)

This post has been updated.

Iran is about to get a refresher course in the capricious nature of the oil market and the durable nature of economic sanctions.

When U.S. and other international sanctions were tightened in 2012 and took nearly 700,000 barrels a day of Iranian crude oil off world markets, the price of an average barrel of OPEC oil ran $109.45.

But with the easing of those sanctions today, Iran is poised to boost its sales of oil in the middle of a massive glut, with the OPEC benchmark average barrel selling for just $25, less than a quarter of the 2012 level.

The result will be sharply lower revenue for Iran than its leaders anticipated two years ago when they began negotiations to end sanctions linked to the Iranian nuclear program. The oil glut will force a slower ramping up of Iran’s oil fields and exports than Iran had planned, and it could make international oil companies more wary and tight-fisted about making new investments.

“In many respects, this could not come at a worse time for Iran, because oil is at 11-year lows and the International Monetary Fund has recently offered quite dismal remarks about Iran’s banking system, economic growth prospects and tepid recovery,” said Elizabeth Rosenberg, director of the energy, economics and security program at the Center for a New American Security.

Moreover, the lifting of sanctions on Iran could heighten tension over reestablishing production quotas in OPEC — especially between Iran and Saudi Arabia, the cartel’s co-founders and longtime rivals. Eager to protect its market share, Saudi Arabia has been pumping at high levels despite calls by some OPEC members that the kingdom rein in output to prop up falling prices. Riyadh’s relationship with Tehran was further strained earlier this month when Saudi Arabia executed a prominent Shiite cleric and, after Iran’s condemnation of the execution, cut diplomatic ties.

The return of production in Iran would further fuel simmering tensions. The Iranian’s hinted that they might hold back.

“We don’t want to start a sort of a price war,” Mohsen Qamsari, director general for international affairs at the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC), told Reuters on Jan. 6. “We will be more subtle in our approach and may gradually increase output,” Qamsari said. “I have to say that there is no room to push prices down any further, given the level where they are.”

Iranian officials earlier pledged to add a half-million barrels a day within six months and 1 million barrels a day in a year. But Bhushan Bahree, a senior director and OPEC expert at IHS Energy, said the consulting firm is forecasting an increase of only 400,000 barrels a day during the next year.

“I think they’ll go in a little gradually both because it is in their interest to do so for price reasons and for its relations with others in OPEC, like Saudi Arabia,” he said.

For companies around the world, implementation day is like flicking the switch on Iran’s economic relations. Iran will be able to conduct banking transactions through the essential Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, or SWIFT. Roughly $100 billion in frozen bank accounts will be released, though about half of it will go to pay debts or other commitments.

In addition, the U.S. Treasury Department, as agreed to under the nuclear accord, will lift sanctions that restricted foreign companies doing business with Iran in finance and banking, insurance, energy and petrochemical sectors, shipping and shipbuilding, gold and precious metals, and more.

Many of those companies have been visiting Iran already. For example, the Mediterranean Shipping Co. has resumed direct services to Iran after a three-year hiatus, according to Lloyd’s List, which tracks the shipping business. Lloyd’s also reported that the Maersk Group’s oil division has been talking with Iran about developing the country’s oil fields.

But for most American companies, the lifting of sanctions linked to Iran’s nuclear program will mean little. Many American citizens, companies and banks are barred from doing business with Iran under other sanctions, legislation and regulations tied to human rights, ballistic missiles and terrorism.

There are exceptions for those involved in aviation, health care or medical devices. Health care and medical devices were exempted for humanitarian reasons. Aviation sales are designed to bolster the safety of Iran’s aging fleet of Boeing passenger planes. Several companies have expressed interest in those sectors, according to consultants who spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect business relationships.

Pistachios and carpets, substantial export items for Iran, also are exempted from the remaining sanctions.

As of Friday, the Treasury Department was still completing regulations for the implementation of remaining sanctions. One item in particular — whether foreign subsidiaries of U.S. firms can conduct business with Iran — was being awaited by company executives to see whether it would be a minor exception or a loophole big enough for an oil tanker to sail through.

On Saturday, Treasury said it would issue licenses on a case-by-case basis but announced some guidelines, such as that foreign subsidiaries will not be able to sell Iran any goods with more than 10 percent U.S. content. The department also gave guidance on deals that can be conducted abroad in dollars, which must be cleared through American financial institutions.

But some ambiguity is likely to remain regarding how to define “activities with Iran” that are “consistent with” the nuclear agreement.

Even U.S., European or Asian companies seeking to do business in Iran face hurdles, however. One obstacle is that investors and traders will be prohibited from doing business with more than 200 Iranian or Iran-related individuals and entities who will remain on the U.S. “Specially Designated Nationals List.” Treasury said about 400 others were removed from the list.

Moreover, the country is plagued by high inflation, subsidies, difficulty getting permits and nonperforming loans.
Worse yet, the Iranian economy is dominated by opaque companies linked to the Revolutionary Guard Corps or the clerical establishment, notes Robert D. Hormats, vice chairman of Kissinger Associates. Many of their executives are on the Treasury’s list of prohibited individuals.

A system of “bonyads,” tax-exempt charitable institutions controlled by the clerics, was established after the 1979 revolution with assets seized from the royal family and wealthy individuals. Hormats said that the Mostazafin Foundation, also known as the Foundation for the Oppressed and the Disabled, has become the second-largest commercial entity in the country.

The bonyads report directly to the supreme leader and are believed to control 20 to 40 percent of the country’s overall wealth.

“It’s an alluring and attractive market because of the talent of the people, its diversity and its raw materials,” said Hormats, “but it is complicated because of the structure and because there are so many influential groups that have such power over individual companies and sectors.”

President Obama’s deputy national security adviser, Ben Rhodes, predicted that foreign companies would take a wait-and-see approach.

“It’s not going to be a flood. And frankly the Iranians know that because there’s still a tangled web of other sanctions,” Rhodes said at a Bloomberg News luncheon Friday. “People I think will want to see. One of the benefits of sanctions is it provides incentives for Iran to continue to [adhere to] the nuclear deal. Some companies are going to wait and see is this going to hold, are these guys going to stick to the agreement? So I think it will be a more incremental process.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Forget Twitter and Facebook! Here’s the One Social Media Stock to Buy for 2016

0

[ad_1]

Editors' Pick: Originally published Dec. 29.

As we tally year-to-date stock performances in the final days of 2015, many of Wall Street's erstwhile angels have dirty faces. Chief among them: Chipotle Mexican Grill (down 28%); GoPro (down 72%); and Twitter (down 37%).

But one "trendy" stock that gets a lot of press has held its own: LinkedIn (LNKD - Get Report) . Essentially flat for the year (in line with the S&P 500), LinkedIn has racked up a five-year gain of 146%, vs. 65% for the S&P 500. On average, analysts expect this stock to gain another 22% over the next year, a period that's expected to be mediocre at best for the broader markets.

LNKD Chart

LNKD data by YCharts

LinkedIn is a rare hybrid animal: a social media stock with stability. That's in stark contrast to a group of overhyped and overvalued investments that are poised for sharp tumbles in 2016.

Must Read: 5 Breakout Stocks to Trade for Gains

LinkedIn is the world's biggest professional networking service on the Internet. Based in Mountain View, Calif., the company was founded in 2003 by former PayPal executive Reid Hoffman, who has emerged as a Silicon Valley guru and billionaire.

LinkedIn reported stellar third-quarter operating results that position the company for outsized performance next year. The company's third-quarter revenue increased 37% year over year to $780 million. Adjusted earnings before interest taxes, depreciation and amortization was $208 million, or 27% of revenue, roughly equal with the same period a year ago. Adjusted earnings per share improved to 78 cents, compared with 52 cents in the same period a year earlier.

Management gave full-year 2015 guidance of revenue in the range of $2.975 billion and $2.980 billion. Adjusted EBITDA is expected to come in at about $740 million. Non-GAAP EPS is expected to reach $2.63.

LinkedIn's cumulative membership in the third quarter grew 20% year over year, to 396 million. That's a big jump, but then again, monetizing member bases and viewership on the Web is notoriously difficult, as the demise of many once-dominant media empires attests. Many social media brainchilds have enjoyed meteoric rises, only to crash because they put all of their revenue eggs in one precarious basket.

One big secret to LinkedIn's success is its multifaceted revenue approach through three business divisions that pursue new sales in three distinct ways: recruiting-tools division, marketing-solutions and premium subscription sales.

Unlike peers such as Facebook and Twitter, LinkedIn gets a much smaller portion of its total revenue from advertising, and instead charges users of premium services a fee.

Admittedly, Facebook now has more than 1 billion monthly active users. But most of these users are millennials, a customer base that's mercurial and suffers from a collective short attention span, as opposed to LinkedIn's more affluent business-oriented clientele.

[ad_2]

Source link

Which markets are closed on Martin Luther King Day?

0

[ad_1]

Getty Images


Martin Luther King Jr. on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial on Aug. 28, 1963, where he delivered his famous “I Have a Dream” speech.

U.S. stock and bond markets are closed Monday for the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday, but it’s business as usual for markets overseas.

Investors could still get a hint of whether the thinking toward the markets has changed over the weekend after Friday’s battering—futures contracts tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average YMH6, -2.11% S&P 500 index Index ESH6, -1.98% and the Nasdaq-100 index NQH6, -2.62% will trade until 1 p.m. Eastern Time.  Oil futures CLG6, -4.81% also will trade during the New York morning through the electronic Globex platform. The U.S. oil benchmark on Friday plunged to under $30, bringing losses for the week to around 10%.

Trading in all Globex contracts will be halted from 1 to 6 p.m. Eastern.

U.S. stock markets will remain closed, and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association has recommended that there be no trading in U.S.-dollar-denominated bonds in the U.S., U.K. and Japan.

Currency markets will be open for trading, but volumes are expected to be light during the North American hours.

The holiday won’t close markets in Europe SXXP, -2.82% —or China SHCOMP, -3.55%

[ad_2]

Source link

3 Ways Yahoo! Could Make a Major Comeback in 2016

0

[ad_1]

It was an appalling year for Yahoo! Inc. (YHOO - Get Report) , which has lost one-third of its value in 2015.

In fact, very few analysts seem confident about the stock's ability to mount a recovery. CEO Marissa Mayer is struggling to come up with new and vibrant ideas to make the company relevant again.

Beyond the web of rumors floating around, and talk of splitting the firm (as suggested by some investors), here are three ways Yahoo! could turn it around. On the flip side, these weak and vulnerable stocks are tottering and stand zero chance of recovery.

YHOO Chart
YHOO data by
YCharts

1. Reinforced identity

Must Read: 3 Reasons Why Beleaguered Dividend Star Merck Is Poised to Break Out in 2016

Despite all that's being said, Yahoo!'s CEO-issues aren't really its principal problem.

There's been a great deal of focus on the pressing need to oust current CEO Mayer (who recently gave birth to twins) and bring in a new order, which could apparently set a change in motion.

The Yahoo! board, we feel, is uncertain at this time about the essentials -- what does Yahoo! represent in a shifting global scenario? What lies ahead for this tech pioneer?

Redefining Yahoo!'s core business model is the key towards initiating a turnaround.

At the moment, this is what comprises Yahoo!'s game-changing plan: "Assets and liabilities other than the Alibaba Group Holding Limited stake are scheduled to be transferred to a newly formed company. Its stock would be distributed pro-rata to shareholders resulting in two separate publicly traded companies."

Now, even if this comes to pass, the big question continues to stay unanswered. We still have little clarity on the core of Yahoo!'s invigorated business model. All we know at this point is that the Alibaba stake is deeply valued and will be kept separate from the strategy.

As per Yahoo!'s plan, its assets, including Tumblr (social media, blogging), Flurry (mobile ads/app analytics), and BrightRoll (video ads) as well as a few others will be poured into one company, while the Alibaba stake will go into another.

Yahoo! investors may not think too highly of Yahoo!'s non-Alibaba assets at this time, but there's a lot of speculation about a number of interested players, including Comcast, News Corp., Time Inc., and Verizon -- that could snap up these Internet assets, or at least a part of them.

[ad_2]

Source link

Editas’ IPO Challenge: Edit Investor Expectations as Well as Diseased Genes

0

[ad_1]

Editas Medicine is most definitely the hottest biotech initial public offering of a very young 2016.

But the challenge for the gene-editing startup will be to find public investors willing to wait the two years estimated before its therapies are ready to start human clinical trials.

The Cambridge, Mass.-based company filed papers Monday night for an IPO of $100 million, although the amount to be raised will most certainly change. Editas' proposed ticker symbol is EDIT -- a near-perfect encapsulation of the company's underlying technology, which aims to treat genetic diseases with a type of molecular scissors capable of cutting out defective, disease-causing genes in patients.

This gene-editing technology, known as Crispr, has shown enormous potential in the laboratory and in limited studies in mice, but has not yet been tested in humans.

Must Read: Feuerstein's Heroes and Zeroes of Biotech Investing in 2015

Editas' most advanced product is a gene-editing therapy to treat leber congenital amaurosis, a genetic disease which causes progressive blindness. But Editas is still conducting pre-clinical work and doesn't expect to begin human studies until 2017.

The scientific buzz around the Crispr gene-editing technology will almost certainly generate a tremendous amount of interest from institutional investors for the Editas IPO. The challenge for the company will be to find investors with the patience and risk tolerance necessary to wait out the long clinical development timelines.

Editas "was incredibly selective in terms of their current investors and I think that will continue to be the case with the IPO," a health care investment fund portfolio manager (and early Editas investor) told me via email Monday night.

"I have no idea what percent of the deal will be oversubscribed, but I hope the company doesn't make the same mistake that others have made and allocate broadly to a bunch of flippers, but rather focus on tightly allocating to long-term oriented folks," he added.

The big but botched Axovant Sciences' (AXON) IPO is what Editas needs to avoid. Axovant leveraged a speculative frenzy for Alzheimer's drugs last June when it priced its initial offering at $15 per share. The stock doubled in value on the first day of trading but the excitement faded fast. By the end of summer, Axovant was trading at $11. Today, the stock is barely above the original IPO offering price.

Editas should benefit from the star power and long-term outlook of some of its early backers. Last year, the company raised $163 million in a preferred stock offering bought by Google Ventures, Bill Gates, Fidelity Investments and venture capital firms Flagship Ventures and Polaris Partners. Editas also has an ongoing cancer therapy partnership with Juno Therapeutics (JUNO) .

"The existing syndicate can buy all of the [Editas] IPO and then some, so they will set the price," a venture capitalist not involved with Editas told me. "If there's lots of demand above that, great. If not, the deal will still price well."

[ad_2]

Source link

Hutchinson Shares Extend Slide on Continued FTC Antitrust Review

0

[ad_1]

After recovering somewhat during the last half of December, shares of Hutchinson Technology HTCH continued their downward slide first triggered Dec. 16 when the company announced that its agreement to be acquired by Japan's TDK Corp. (TTDKY) faces an extended antitrust review by the Federal Trade Commission.

Hutchinson, which makes suspension assemblies for hard disk drives, announced its $124 million deal with TDK on Nov. 2. The offer includes $3.62 in cash upfront plus up to another 38 cents per share depending on the outstanding borrowings on Hutchinson's revolving line of credit when the deal closes. The total compensation possible to Hutchinson shareholders is $4 per share.

Hutchinson shares were trading at $3.68 just prior to announcement of the FTC's investigation and dropped to $3.54 over the next five days. The shares then rebounded to $3.60 by the end of the month. Monday, however, the shares slid again, closing at $3.55. The price was unchanged early Tuesday. The stock price is still well above the $1.75 it traded at when the merger was announced at the beginning of November.

Suspension assemblies are critical components of disk drives that hold the read/write heads in position above the spinning magnetic disks. Hutchinson's principal competitors are Nihon Hatsujo Kabusikigaisha, known as NHK; TDK's subsidiary Magnecomp Precision Technology; NAT Peripheral Co. Ltd., which is a joint venture of NHK and TDK. So essentially the merger would leave only NHK and TDK as the globe's two primary producers.

It remains uncertain if the FTC will approve the acquisition of Hutchinson, but if it does the agency will very likely require the NHK and TDK joint venture to be unwound.

When the FTC's extended investigation was announced, the company said it was "cooperating with the FTC staff since the announcement of the merger agreement and are continuing to work cooperatively with the FTC staff."

When the deal was announced, TDK said it expected to complete the deal during the first quarter of 2016. Since announcement of the FTC review, known as a second request for information, it has revised its closing prediction to either late in the first quarter or sometime during the second quarter.

Hutchinson has scheduled a special shareholder meeting to vote on the deal for Jan. 28.

Despite the FTC review, Hutchinson has maintained that competitive pressures in the suspension assembly market, as well as in hard drives generally, makes consolidation necessary. In its latest 10-K filing, Hutchinson officials said, "We believe that consolidation in the disk drive industry . . . has resulted in shifts in certain industry supply chain alignments that have negatively impacted our competitive position since 2008. We believe that the number of entities that have the technical capability and capacity for producing precision suspension assemblies or components in large volumes will remain small."

Technological change, particularly the development of alternatives to hard disk drives, is also negatively affecting the suspension assembly market. "We believe disk drives will remain the primary data storage technology for the foreseeable future," the company said in its annual report.

However, other types of data storage technology, such as solid state storage or flash (semiconductor) memory, have become competitive with certain disk drive applications, and therefore negatively affect the demand for our products. As an example, emerging applications requiring digital storage, particularly consumer electronics products that require lower storage capacity, are using flash memory, which has and may continue to limit growth opportunities for disk drive-based data storage."

To remain in the market, producers will have to be competitive in price, reliability of volume supply, time to market, product performance, quality, and customer service, the company said. "Disk drive manufacturers seek low cost designs and as the disk drive industry has matured and consolidated. "Cost competitiveness, and thus suspension assembly pricing, has become an increasingly important factor to our customers."

[ad_2]

Source link

Global stocks hammered as oil prices push further below $3 – New Vision

0

[ad_1]

"The markets are trapped in a vicious circle," said Alexandre Baradez, an analyst at IG France.

Oilpricesinsert 703x422

Stock markets around the world fell heavily Friday as investors reacted to new 12-year lows for oil prices and a big drop in Chinese equities.

A 3.6 percent drop in the Shanghai index pushed the Chinese market into an official bear market -- defined as a 20 percent fall from a recent high -- and sparked a wave of selling that extended from Frankfurt to Moscow to New York.

"Pervasive gloom," read the title of a Barclays note.

Barclays slashed its forecast for oil prices due to a "worsening" macro outlook and predicted further European Central Bank stimulus in light of deflationary worries. On the positive side, the "pessimism about US growth is overdone in light of solid labor market momentum," Barclays added.

"The markets are trapped in a vicious circle," said Alexandre Baradez, an analyst at IG France.
"The session started off poorly with China, which set things off, leading to oil prices falling, then European markets and Wall Street dropping."

Frankfurt fell 2.4 percent, Paris 2.3 percent and London 1.9 percent. The Dow in the US ended 2.4 percent lower after dropping more than 3.0 percent earlier in the session.

The leading Moscow index dropped 5.8 percent, while Brazil's Ibovespa index lost 2.4 percent.

- Global recession? -

The widespread market losses over the start of 2016 has sparked talk of the potential for a global recession.

David Levy, portfolio manager at Kenjol Capital Management, said such a downturn would likely be less severe than in 2008 because fewer assets are overvalued.

"Even if we are in a global recession, I don't think the damage will be nearly as significant as a 2008-type event," Levy said.

"But certainly the evidence is giving us a higher probability of recession in 2016 and certainly the market is speaking that it believes that is a possibility."

US oil benchmark West Texas Intermediate finished at $29.13 a barrel, taking the losses since the beginning of the year to more than 21 percent.

Industrial metals, including copper, also fell, but safe-haven gold gained.

"Investors are shifting funds into areas of perceived safety including gold and government bonds in hopes of protecting themselves," said Jasper Lawler at CMC Markets UK.

- Automakers skid lower -

European auto stocks tumbled again, with Renault shedding an additional 3.4 percent after unions reported Thursday that anti-fraud investigators had raided several of the company's sites.

Renault ended 10.3 percent lower on Thursday on the news, which raised fears of a Volkswagen-type scandal.

Shares in Peugeot, France's biggest automaker ahead of Renault, fell 2.6 percent in Paris while Renault alliance partner Nissan's stock closed 1.9 percent lower in Tokyo.

Daimler shares lost 1.9 percent, BMW 2.6 percent and Volkswagen 3.5 percent.

In the US, investors hammered banking shares after Citigroup set aside $250 million in reserves for its energy portfolio and warned of a deeper hit if oil prices fall further.

Citigroup tumbled 6.4 percent, while Wells Fargo, which also reported a higher hit from oil, lost 3.6 percent.
Petroleum and technology were two other weak sectors, while Disney tumbled 5.3 percent following a downgrade by Barclays due to worries about sports network ESPN's prospects.

- Key figures around 2200 GMT -

New York - Dow: DOWN 2.4 percent at 15,988.08 (close)

New York - S&P 500: DOWN 2.2 percent at 1,880.29 (close)

New York - Nasdaq Composite: DOWN 3.1 percent at 4,488.42 (close)

London - FTSE 100: DOWN 1.9 percent at 5,804.10 points (close)

Frankfurt - DAX 30: DOWN 2.5 percent at 9, (close)

Paris - CAC 40: DOWN 2.4 percent at 4,210.16 (close)

EURO STOXX 50: DOWN 2.4 percent at 2,952.48 (close)

Tokyo - Nikkei 225: DOWN 0.5 percent at 17,147.11 (close)

Shanghai - Composite: DOWN 3.6 percent at 2,900.97 (close)

Euro/dollar: UP at $1.0916 from $1.0865 Thursday

Dollar/yen: DOWN at 116.96 yen from 118.06 yen

[ad_2]

Source link

Weakening Chip Stocks Sounding Strong Economic Warning

0

[ad_1]

How's the economy doing? Look at semiconductor stocks.

Global sales of consumer durables and hand-held devices such as cell phones have been sliding, which is a drag on economic growth. These devices run on computer chips, which makes the semiconductor industry a bellwether for the economy.

TheStreet's Jim Cramer said he favors the semiconductor companies whose products do not go into cell phones. However, he said, reports that Apple (AAPL) -- a holding in his charitable portfolio Action Alerts PLUS -- is cutting iPhone production because of weakening demand is tarring all chip companies with the same brush.

"I wish I could take a stand" on such companies as Avago Technologies (AVGO - Get Report)  and Skyworks Networks (SWKS)  "but they are so inextricably linked to the fortunes of Apple that I can't risk it," Cramer said.

Exclusive Look Inside:

You see Jim Cramer on TV. Now, see where he invests his money and why. Learn more now.

From a technical standpoint, the best way to measure demand for semiconductors is by tracking the performance of the PHLX Semiconductor Index and seven of its components: Avago, Skyworks, Applied Materials (AMAT - Get Report) , Intel (INTC - Get Report) , Micron (MU - Get Report) , Qualcomm (QCOM - Get Report)  and Texas Instruments (TXN) .

Must Read: As Apple Cuts iPhone Output, Should You Be Scared About the Stock's Future?

The semiconductor index, also known as the SOX, is a subset of the Nasdaq Composite (NDAQ) . It did not set a new, all-time high in 2015 but it set a multiyear high of 751.21 on June 1. Believe it or not, the March 2000 all-time high for the SOX was 1,362.10. What this implies is that the semiconductor industry has not been providing the economic stimulus most market strategists expected.

Sure, the components of the SOX are different from what they were in March 2000. But the key point is the current components could not drive the SOX anywhere near its all-time high. In the late-1990s it was Federal Reserve Chief Alan Greenspan's fear of Y2K, which influenced corporations to upgrade systems to prevent applications to misfire when clocks touched midnight entering the year 2000. This drove demand for computer chips to the moon. There are no such demand drivers today.

Let's take a look at the weekly charts. A negative weekly chart occurs when the weekly close for the market is below its key weekly moving average with weekly sentiment declining below the overbought threshold of 80.00.

The charts show the key weekly moving average in red, the 200-week simple moving average in green, and the weekly momentum reading is shown in red in the study at the bottom of the chart.

Here's the weekly chart for Applied Materials.


Courtesy of MetaStock Xenith

The weekly chart for Applied Materials shifts to negative from neutral given a weekly below its key weekly moving average of 17.98 if the weekly momentum reading declines below the overbought threshold of 80.00. The current reading is 81.0. A key level to hold is the 200-week simple moving average of 17.07, which held at Thursday's low.

The stock closed Thursday at $17.21. After declining 25.1% in 2015, it's down 7.8% after the first four days of 2016. This puts the stock in bear market territory 33.1% below its multiyear high of $25.71 set on Dec. 23, 2014.

Investors looking for short-term trades should enter a good till canceled (GTC) limit order to buy this stock if it declines to $15.85, which is a key level on technical charts until the end of January. Investors looking to reduce holdings should enter a GTC limit order to sell this stock if it rises to $23.05, which is a key level on technical charts until the end of March.

Here's the weekly chart for Avago.


Courtesy of MetaStock Xenith

The weekly chart for Avago shifts to negative from positive but overbought given a close today below its key weekly moving average of 136.52 if the weekly momentum reading declines below the overbought threshold of 80.00. The current reading is 79.33 but it was 80.70 on Wednesday. A key level to hold is the 200-week simple moving average of 70.39.

The stock closed Thursday at $129.05. After gaining 44.3% in 2015, it's down 11.1% after the first four days of 2016. This puts the stock in correction territory 14.3% below its all-time high of $150.50 set on June 1.

Investors looking for short-term trades should enter a good till canceled limit order to buy this stock if it declines to $122.44, which is a key level on technical charts until the end of 2016. Investors looking to reduce holdings should enter a GTC limit order to sell this stock if it rises to $138.63, which is a key level on technical charts until the end of June.

[ad_2]

Source link

Jim Cramer — Oil’s Supply-Demand Imbalance Could Be Worse

0

[ad_1]

Crude oil prices plunged Thursday, with West Texas Intermediate falling to $32.12 per barrel. However, oil prices have since turned positive on the day, currently trading above $34 per barrel.

There's "way too much oil," TheStreet's Jim Cramer, co-manager of the Action Alerts PLUS portfolio, said on CNBC's "Squawk on the Street."

Cramer found it interesting that oil prices are finding support near their December 2008 levels, even if that support is only temporary.

XLE Chart
Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF XLE data by YCharts

What should stop prices from falling to multi-decade lows? Oil prices were in the $20s from 2000-2003, and below $20 per barrel from 1998 to 2000, he pointed out.

"We did have tremendous oversupply then, too, more than we have oversupply now," Cramer said.

Must Read: More Squawk From Jim Cramer: Constellation Brands (STZ) Stock Soars on ‘Great Earnings’

Today, however, according to his recent conversation with oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens on CNBC's "Mad Money" show, the current supply-demand imbalance is off by only about one million barrels per day.

That's a far cry from where the supply-demand imbalance was in previous years, although Cramer acknowledged that lower prices are in the realm of possibilities. For his part, Pickens believes oil prices are close to a bottom, and made the case for why oil could return to $70 per barrel by year end.

[ad_2]

Source link

A (hopefully) quick end to a bear market, and nine other money stories you may have missed

0

[ad_1]

Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images


What may be good news for investors is that bear markets for U.S. stocks tend to end soon after reaching a 20% decline.

MarketWatch rounded up 10 of the most interesting money stories published over the past week that readers might have overlooked.

Bear markets tend to end quickly

The S&P 500 Index SPX, -2.16% was down 6.4% this year through Thursday, and tumbled as much as 2.3% on Friday.

FactSet

The S&P 500 has returned only 4.5%, with dividends reinvested, over the past 24 months.

Mark Hulbert shared some interesting facts based on the history of bear markets for U.S. stocks. A bear market is typically defined as a decline of at least 20%, and as soon as you realize you are in one, it will probably soon be over.

Oil prices

Oil prices keep falling, and there’s no end to predictions of how far they will decline before the inevitable turnaround. Higher-cost producers will be forced to keep cutting production, and as the law of supply and demand tells us, there will come a point when the momentum swings the other way, as it always has.

William Watts pointed out that the cheapest high-grade crude oil in the world right now is in a surprising place: the oil sands of Canada.

The return of inflation?

Rex Nutting interviewed Stephen Stanley, chief economist for Amherst Pierpont Securities, who said he expected the Federal Reserve to raise the benchmark federal funds rate four times during 2016.

It wouldn’t shock me if inflation is higher than the Fed thinks it will be,” Stanley said, which could cause the central bank to raise rates higher than is currently “baked“ into securities valuations by the market.

Despite all the fearful headlines that rising inflation would cause, it would likely be a good thing for many savers and investors. During a time of higher inflation, if you are earning a decent return on your savings while also holding down expenses as much as possible, you just might be “getting ahead.”

Avoid China, but consider other emerging markets

Bill Mann, chief investment officer of Motley Fool Asset Management, said in an interview that investors should avoid overexposure to stocks in China and consider other emerging markets.

“China is, at its core, not a market,” he said, because of heavy-handed government interference. We also listed the best-performing emerging markets funds, with a clear trend for the strongest performance in one country.

Analysts still like biotech

Victor Reklaitis discussed the political and technical reasons behind the recent slide for biotechnology stocks, and how analysts still like them for the long-term. And Michael Brush highlighted 10 attractive biotechnology stocks.

Another look at McDonald’s

Shares of McDonald’s Corp. MCD, -1.23% are down only 1.3% this year through Thursday. The stock has returned 32% over the past 12 months, with dividends reinvested, compared with a decline of 2.4% for the S&P 500.

Tonya Garcia took a detailed look at the company’s introduction of all-day breakfast in October, and what it means for McDonald’s long-term revenue growth prospects.

Feds take a closer look at cash real estate buyers

Are you sitting on a mountain of cash, wondering what to do with it? It might be a nice problem to have, but if you are thinking of using a shell company to purchase high-end properties in Miami or New York without borrowing, you should expect plenty of scrutiny from the U.S. Treasury’s financial crimes enforcement network, according to Wallace Witkowski.

Temporary reporting requirements that kick in on March 1 will require title companies to report the identity of people using shell companies to make the purchases.

How low might Apple’s stock fall?

Shares of Apple Inc. AAPL, -2.40% the world’s largest company by market value, have fallen 5.5% this year through Thursday and 7.8% over the past year. Sara Sjolin discussed Alphabet Inc.’s GOOG, -2.84% concurrent rise, and the price level at which analysts believe Apple will once again be a compelling stock.

Apple chases Tesla

Remember when electric cars were considered cool? That may seem like a far-off time, with gasoline prices falling so much, but the long-term viability of electric cars seems clear. Jennifer Booton looked into the challenges faced by Apple as it makes what some analysts say is a too-late entry into the business.

Then again, coming late to the party may suit Apple. After all, the iPod was introduced after several other MP3 players were available, but Apple took over that space very quickly. One can say the same thing about smartphones. Remember when everybody was carrying around a BlackBerry or Palm Treo?

It’s now much easier to ‘play’ pot

Kathleen Burke discussed the Terra Tech Corp.’s TRTC, -0.71% agreement to acquire Blum Oakland dispensary, and the creation of the first publicly traded “fully integrated company that is directly involved with the production, extraction and sale of cannabis.”

That will make it a lot easier for investors looking to make major bets in the space, but serious challenges remain, because varying local laws make it difficult for marijuana companies to find banks willing to do business with them.
[ad_2]

Source link

Miserable? Blame the rich

0

[ad_1]

Feeling miserable these days? You may be able to blame the 1%.

As the share of income held by the super rich (those in the top 1% of the income distribution) increases, the life satisfaction of the rest of us decreases, according to the “Top Incomes and Human Well-being Around the World” study released on Dec. 28th.

“Our research shows that, worldwide, income inequality at the very top makes us all less happy with our lives, even if we’re relatively well-off,” said co-author Jan-Emmanuel De Neve, an associate professor in economics and strategy at the University of Oxford, in a statement released Tuesday.



The study used data from the Gallup World Poll and the World Top Incomes Database to plot the share of taxable income by the so-called 1% as compared to reported levels of life satisfaction and positive and negative emotional well-being.

Furthermore, in general, in societies where the 1% holds a larger share of the wealth, citizens report feeling more negative emotions than in those where income is more evenly distributed.



These findings come at a same time that income inequality has been rising in many countries. “In advanced economies, the gap between the rich and poor is at its highest level in decades,” according to research published by the International Monetary Fund last year.

In America, for example, the total share of income earned by the top 1% of families was less than 10% in the late 1970s; by 2012, it had reached levels not seen since the Great Depression, with more than 20% of the income owned by the top 1%, according to research from Emmanuel Saez, an economics professors at the University of California at Berkeley. (In fact, America’s 20 wealthiest people — a group that could fit in one Gulfstream G650 jet — have more wealth than the 152 million people who make up the least wealthy 50% of U.S. households.)

You've won the $1.5 billion Powerball. Who should you call?

So you've won the $1.5 billion Powerball jackpot. Who should you call? What should you do with the ticket to keep it safe? How can you avoid the mistakes of other big winners? Financial planner Steve Lewit has tips to keep your new-found windfall from disappearing.

The reason we become less happy as income inequality rises may be that as rich people get richer, they “extend the range of the income distribution,” which means that even reasonably well-off people can no longer afford certain things like private school or homes in the best neighborhoods, the researchers write in a post published Tuesday on Harvard Business Review.

Furthermore, “an increase in the share of income held by the richest 1% can make you feel as if your chance of moving up the ladder and becoming very rich yourself is growing increasingly beyond your reach,” they conclude.

This study does not prove causation; it simply shows that there is a strong correlation between rising income inequality and lowered life satisfaction and increased negative emotions. Plus, it did not look at this relationship in all countries, as data on that was not available.
[ad_2]

Source link

Jim Cramer — VF Corp, Under Armour Downgrades Concern Me

0

[ad_1]

Although investors are doing their best to push a rebound in stock prices, it's been hard for some retail stocks Monday. Shares of VF Corp  (VFC - Get Report)  are down 2% and Under Armour (UA - Get Report)  down 8% following downgrades from Morgan Stanley.

These are "devastating" reports on two stocks that have been decimated over the past few months, TheStreet's Jim Cramer, co-manager of the Action Alerts PLUS portfolio, said on CNBC's "Mad Dash" segment.

Shares of VF Corp. are down 20% over the past three months, while Under Armour stock is down nearly 33% in that span. Analysts downgraded both stocks to underweight, preferring Nike (NKE - Get Report) to Under Armour and favoring Hanesbrands (HBI - Get Report) over VF Corp, Cramer said.

VFC Chart
UA and VFC data by YCharts

He explained the analysts' reports were very "rigorous" and suggested any investor interested in trying to pick a bottom in one of these two stocks should read them first.

For Under Armour, analysts cited falling average selling prices, a mature U.S. apparel business and a decline in footwear prices.

Must Read: Under Armour's New Wearables Raise Key Strategy Question for Nike

For Cramer fave VF Corp., the analysts said long-term growth appears ready to slow while VF's Timberland and North Face brands may have peaked, Cramer added.

"These are great companies," he said, but these reports are thorough and so they concern him. In general, the overall stock market's valuation must decline in order for the bulls to become highly convicted buyers of stocks, Cramer concluded.

[ad_2]

Source link

Obama administration halts new coal leases on federal land – Great Falls Tribune

0

[ad_1]

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is imposing a moratorium on new coal leases on federal land, arguing that the program has remained largely unchanged for more than 30 years and requires a comprehensive review.

The coal leasing program must be modernized to ensure a fair financial return to American taxpayers and account for climate change, Interior Secretary Sally Jewell said Friday in announcing the halt. The move drew praise from environmental groups and Democrats, but condemnation from Republicans who called it another volley in what they assert is a “war on coal” being waged by President Barack Obama.

“It is abundantly clear that times are different than they were 30 years ago, and the time for review (of the coal leasing program) is now,” Jewell told reporters in a conference call.

She called the moratorium, effective immediately and expected to last through the remainder of Obama’s final year in office, a “prudent step to hit pause.”

The federal program to lease coal-mining rights to a single bidder has remained largely unchanged for more than 30 years, despite complaints that low royalty rates and a near-total lack of competition have cost the government hundreds of millions of dollars a year.

More than 40 percent of U.S. coal production, or about 450 million tons a year, comes from public land in Wyoming, Montana and other Western states, bringing in more than $1 billion in annual revenue.

Montana’s Republican delegation in Washington criticized the decision.

Rep. Ryan Zinke, R-Mont., said the move is “disastrous” for Montana, a state that sits on one-third of the nation’s recoverable reserves. “This administration’s war on coal just got a lot more personal for us in the West,” he declared.

Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., called it an “unprecedented assault on one of Montana’s most important sources of good-paying jobs and tax revenue” that will probably result in the end of coal development in Montana and Wyoming’s Powder River Basin.

“Take it or leave it proposals are exactly what’s wrong in Washington these days,” said Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont. “Unfortunately, the president is contributing to this dysfunction. Yes, we’ve got to look at the coal-leasing program to make sure taxpayers are getting a fair shake. But to stop new leases without proper public input undermines our Montana values of transparency and accountability.”

Montana Gov. Steve Bullock, a Democrat, said Obama was “wrong” in his decision and would make sure Montana is involved as the process moves forward. “Montana’s working families are left bearing the brunt of his unilateral action,” he said.

Nearly 90 percent of coal tracts leased by the Interior Department receive just a single bid, and royalty rates have remain unchanged since 1976. The lack of competition and other problems in the leasing program have cost the government as much as $200 million a year in lost revenue, according to a 2014 report by the Government Accountability Office.

Coal reserves already under lease can continue to be mined, and a limited number of sales will be allowed, Jewell said.

It’s unclear what impact the moratorium will have on U.S. coal production, given declining domestic demand and the closure of numerous coal-fired power plants around the country. Coal companies have already stockpiled billions of tons of coal on existing leases in Wyoming, Montana, Colorado, Utah and New Mexico.

“This announcement comes as no surprise from an administration that seems hell-bent on forcing the coal industry to come to a screeching halt,” said Bud Clinch, executive director of the Montana Coal Council.

Glenn Oppel, government relations director for the Montana Chamber of Commerce, said federal coal royalties total between $40 and $50 million in biennial revenue to the state. “Losing that would leave a gaping hole in our state budget and represents a huge tax shift to Montana homeowners and small businesses,” he said.

Even so, environmental groups cheered the announcement. The groups have long said the government’s 12.5 percent royalty rate for coal mining on federal land encouraged production of a “dirty” fuel that contributes to global warming.

Anne Hedges, deputy director for the Montana Environmental Information Center, said the White House’s announcement is the latest sign that interest in dirty fossil fuels is waning because of its impact on water, economy and people who use public land. Instead, she said, more people are embracing cleaner, renewable energy.

“It’s a great step but there is a long way to go,” Hedges said. “It sends the right message to the markets that it’s time invest in the future, not the past.”

Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., said taxpayers are being shortchanged on royalties that do not reflect the true costs of mining, both in terms of its economic value to mining companies and its impact on the environment. Getting royalty rates right is especially important “given how much coal comes off federal land,” said Cantwell, the top Democrat on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

“I’m glad to see the president take this action. We need to stop the sweet deal (mining companies) have been getting,” Cantwell said.

Government auditors for years have questioned the adequacy of the royalty rate for coal and whether it provided an appropriate return to the government, although they did not make specific recommendations to raise it. Industry groups counter that any increase in royalty rates will hurt consumers and threaten high-paying jobs.

Jewell’s announcement follows Obama’s statement during the State of the Union address that he would push to change the way the federal government manages its oil and coal resources.

Jewell and other officials said Friday that the review will take at least three years — long after Obama leaves office next January — but will include an interim report due by the end of the year.

“I am confident we will get a good way down the track in this administration,” she said, although officials later acknowledged that the next president will not be legally bound to complete the review.

Chris Doering in the Tribune’s Washington bureau contributed to this report.

Read or Share this story: http://gftrib.com/1RqSmv9

[ad_2]

Source link

A Lack of News and Buzz at ‘JPM16’ Sinks Biotech Stocks

0

[ad_1]

Investors navigated cramped hotel hallways and hustled between company presentations on the opening day of the J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference on Monday while staring incredulously at their smartphones. Biotech stocks large and small were plummeting, and the painful start to 2016 was turning torturous.

The largest and most important healthcare conference held in San Francisco at this time each year is supposed to generate news and excitement to get investors in the mood to buy biotech stocks. But this year, there were very few market-moving announcements.

Shire (SHPG - Get Report) finally clinched its $32 billion acquisition of Baxalta (BXLT) , but the deal had been discussed for months and was therefore widely expected by investors. No other significant biotech M&A deals were announced Monday.

Celgene (CELG - Get Report) offered 2016 revenue and earnings guidance at the conference, but it was largely in line with current consensus expectations, so investors shrugged. None of the other large-cap biotech companies provided guidance Monday.

Must Read: Deutsche Bank Recommends These 8 Health Care Stocks on Market Volatility

Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VRTX - Get Report) offered a limited and conservative sales outlook for one of its cystic fibrosis drugs, Kalydeco, while holding off on providing guidance on a second, more important drug, Orkambi.

Nearly every other company deciding to disclose 2016 sales guidance Monday told investors what they already knew. Almost across the board, company guidance was "in line" with consensus expectations.

A dull start to the J.P Morgan Healthcare conference contributed to a bad day for biotech stocks. The SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) fell 6% Monday to 57.08, a level it had not visited since November 2014. In the early afternoon Monday, the XBI was down more than 8%.

The XBI, the ETF with the broadest portfolio of biotech stocks, has now lost more than 18% to start 2016.

Among large cap biotech stocks, Celgene closed down 5%. Vertex lost 6% and Alexion Pharmaceuticals (ALXN - Get Report) fell 3%. Gilead Sciences  (GILD) managed to close flat, which should be considered a major victory.

Bad news announced Monday was punished severely. Genvec (GNVC) fell 61% because enrollment for clinical trial of a gene therapy for hearing loss was stopped for a patient safety check.

Bluebird Bio (BLUE) dropped 18% after the company said it would wait until next December to present updated results on its gene therapy clinical trials in beta-thalassemia and sickle cell disease.

"Biotech stocks were on sale today," a healthcare investor remarked to me while waiting for a company presentation to begin. "The scarier thing is that prices could be marked down even lower in the coming days."

[ad_2]

Source link

Thermo Fisher Can Afford More Deals After Affymetrix Buy

0

[ad_1]

Thermo Fisher Scientific  (TMO - Get Report) is buying Affymetrix  (AFFX - Get Report) for $1.3 billion, and, despite paying a steep 20 times Ebitda for the business, the medical device maker still appears to be financially nimble to make more acquisitions, according to analysts.

"The nice part about this deal is that it gives them the flexibility with capital allocation to do more deals," said Matthew Mishan of KeyBanc Captial Markets in a phone interview. "In diagnostics, specifically, specialty diagnostics, they haven't done a deal. That's a higher-margin, higher-growth business they could look to expand."

Thermo announced Friday it had agreed to pay $1.3 billion, or $14 per share, for Santa Clara, Calif.-based Affymetrix, which provides genetic analysis of biological systems that help drug developers identify and understand disease mechanisms. The deal is Thermo's largest since it acquired Life Technologies Corp. for about $13.6 billion on Feb. 3, 2014.

Jack Mohr, co-portfolio manager for Jim Cramer's charitable portfolio, Action Alerts PLUS, said the acquisition is a good strategic fit for the company and "is well aligned with our view that TMO is constantly -- yet selectively -- identifying ways to create value for shareholders."

In addition, the size of the transaction "is in line with our views on the company’s M&A strategy, which we see as Thermo Fisher’s best use of capital. From management’s recent commentary, it has been clear that the company expects to maintain a disciplined capital deployment strategy with tuck-in M&A as the preferred use of cash, followed by share repurchase," according to Mohr.

Even after the $1.3 billion acquisition, "we believe TMO -- as a direct result of its robust free- cash-flow generation and high operating margins -- can deploy an incremental $2.5 billion of capital through dividends, buybacks and/or further accretive tuck-in acquisitions this year. This would still allow Thermo to end the year with a net debt to Ebitda (i.e., leverage) ratio within its targeted range of 2.5 times to 3 times."

Exclusive Look Inside:

You see Jim Cramer on TV. Now, see where he invests his money and why. Learn more now.

Thermo will integrate Affymetrix into its Life Sciences Solutions business, which provides services to the pharma and biotech industry. Affymetrix's technology is used in a variety of clinical and applied markets, including reproductive health and agricultural biotechnology.

"Overall, we are inclined to view the deal as a prelude as TMO possibly re-enters an era of re-accelerated capital deployment, now that debt post the Life transaction has been reduced," wrote Stifel Financial analyst Miroslava Minkova in a note Monday.

[ad_2]

Source link

Here’s Why Apple Is Surging in China — Tech Roundup

0

[ad_1]

Apple (AAPL - Get Report) rose Tuesday after Bank of America Merrill Lynch analysts upgraded the stock, saying they're bullish on the launches of the new Apple Watch, the iPhone 6c and the iPhone 7 along with the company's large cash balance.

In addition, the bank's China survey showed that iPhone is the most popular brand there, and about half of current users plan to buy a new iPhone in the next year. That could give Apple a gain in market share.

The iPhone 6c will likely be priced lower and may "drive increased conversions from feature phones," analyst Wamsi Mohan and his team wrote.

Also, investors have largely discounted worries over a lackluster cycle for the iPhone 6s, which had prompted the bank's August downgrade, the analysts wrote.

Must Read: Jim Cramer Eyes Two Big Theme Park Winners From Low Gas Prices

The bank upgraded Apple to a buy rating from neutral, with a $130 price target. Apple rose 1.5% to $99.96.


Google (GOOGL - Get Report) may be working to catch up to Facebook (FB - Get Report) and Microsoft (MSFT - Get Report) in the realm of virtual reality.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai has put a key deputy in charge of forming a dedicated division for VR computing, according to Re/code. Clay Bavor, vice president for product management is focusing on VR products after having overseen Google's apps, including Gmail, Drive and Docs, and the Google Cardboard VR device. Senior Vice President Diane Greene will be taking over the apps division, the news organization reported, saying that Google had confirmed the moves but declined to comment on them.

Many in the industry had been questioning Google's dedication to VR after the company fumbled with Google Glass, Re/code wrote. Bavor's move shows that Google is taking seriously the threat from Facebook and its Oculus product, which currently has 400 people working on it, according to the article.

Google parent Alphabet rose 1.7% to $745.34 on Tuesday, while Facebook gained 1.9% to $99.37 and Microsoft advanced 1% to $52.78.


Twitter (TWTR - Get Report) , whose shares have suffered amid flat user growth and concerns about the CEO's split focus, announced a new feature meant to keep users from leaving the social-media service's timeline by enhancing their real-time experience.

Live video broadcasts from the sister app Periscope will now start playing automatically from users' Twitter feeds, so viewers will no longer have to launch a separate app, the company said. Twitter bought Periscope last year.

Periscope said it is rolling out the feature for Twitter on iOS over the next few days and will launch Android and web versions "as soon as they're ready."

[ad_2]

Source link

Jim Cramer — You Should Stick With Intel and Darden

0

[ad_1]

Shares of Intel (INTC - Get Report) are up Tuesday thanks to an upgrade to buy from hold at Mizuho.

The company also received positive coverage from J.P. Morgan, TheStreet's Jim Cramer, co-manager of the Action Alerts PLUS portfolio, said on CNBC's "Mad Dash" segment.

These types of reports are "very bullish" for a stock heading into earnings, Cramer added. Intel reports Thursday.

Cramer praised CEO Brian Krzanich for doing a "wonderful job reinventing the company," especially after its acquisition of Altera. As the company shifts its business away from personal computers, look for the stock to trade with a higher price-to-earnings valuation, he said.

INTC Chart
Intel INTC data by YCharts

Turning to Darden Restaurants (DRI - Get Report) , Cramer pointed out that activist investor Starboard Value sold 1.3 million shares of the company. But investors shouldn't panic because the fund still holds an 8.1% stake in the stock.

Must Read: 2016 Is Shaping Up to Be a Year of Market Volatility After a Difficult 2015

"Don't sell Darden on a trim by a hedge fund that has a big gain. That's not a good reason to sell," Cramer explained. "The last quarter for Darden was extremely well," and the restaurant company is a big beneficiary of lower gas prices, he added.

DRI Chart
Darden Restaurants DRI data by YCharts

Aside from Darden, few others have cited low gasoline as a positive catalyst. Some of those include Six Flags (SIX - Get Report) , Cedar Fair (FUN - Get Report) and Carnival (CCL - Get Report) .

Now that most of their hedges have expired, the airlines should also benefit from lower fuel costs, Cramer said. As a result, he likes this industry.

[ad_2]

Source link

Regional Banks Need Healthy Earnings to Offset Balance Sheet Concerns

0

[ad_1]

Wall Street and most buy-side analysts expected regional banks to benefit from higher interest rates as soon as the Federal Reserve began to raise interest rates. The Fed raised the federal funds rate on Dec. 16 but regional bank stocks did not rally; instead, they declined into correction territory more than 10% below multiyear or all-time highs set in July 2015.

Between this Friday and Jan. 21 BB&T Corp (BBT - Get Report) , M&T Bank (MTB - Get Report) , PNC Financial (PNC - Get Report) , SunTrust (STI - Get Report) and U.S. Bancorp (USB - Get Report) report earnings for the fourth quarter of 2015.

From a technical standpoint, higher interest rates have not been positive for regional banks, based on data from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and comments from the FDIC Chairman, Martin Gruenberg. That's why I said it was time to take profits on regional banks. This was based on continued FDIC concerns about credit risks as banks extend out the yield curve to pick up net interest margins.

Here's a scorecard for the five key regional banks.

Let's focus is on the daily charts as these stocks cascade below their Fibonacci retracements from their all-time or multiyear highs set in July to their "flash crash" lows of Aug. 24 or lower later in 2015.

Must Read: Jim Cramer Says Avoid Citigroup; Should You?

Here's the daily chart for BB&T Corp.


Courtesy of MetaStock Xenith

The daily chart for BB&T shows the stock ended 2015 below its 50% Fibonacci retracement of $38.07. The horizontal lines are the retracements from the multiyear high of $41.90 set on July 23 to the 2015 low of $34.24 set on Oct. 2.

As 2016 began the stock plunged below its 38.2% retracement of $37.17. Then, on Jan. 7, the stock gapped below its 23.6% retracement of $36.05. The stock closed Tuesday at $34.90 in correction territory 16.7% below the July 23 high. The stock is just 1.9% above the low set on Oct. 2.

Note in a "sell on strength" strategy investors could have reduced holdings at its 61.8% retracement of $38.98 between Nov. 6 and Dec. 7.

Investors looking to buy BB&T should place a good till canceled limit order to buy the stock if it drops to $32.71, which is a key level on technical charts until the end of 2016.

BB&T is scheduled to report quarterly earnings before the opening bell on Jan. 21 and analysts expect the bank to earn 70 cents a share.

Here's the daily chart for M&T Bank Corp.


Courtesy of MetaStock Xenith

The daily chart for M&T shows the stock ended 2015 below its 50% Fibonacci retracement of $122.74. The horizontal lines are the retracements from the multiyear high of $134 set on July 23 to the 2015 low of $111.50 set on Oct. 2.

As 2016 began the stock plunged below its 38.2% retracement of $120.08. Then, on Jan. 6, the stock crashed below its 23.6% retracement of $116.79. The stock closed Tuesday at $110.49 in correction territory 19.2% below the July 23 high. The stock set a lower low of $108.32 on Jan. 11.

In a sell on strength strategy investors could have reduced holdings at its 61.8% retracement of $125.40 between Oct. 28 and Dec. 17.

Investors looking to buy M&T should place a good till canceled limit order to buy the stock if it drops to $95.68, which is the April 2013 low.

M&T is scheduled to report quarterly earnings on Jan. 19 and analysts expect the bank to earn $1.95 a share.

[ad_2]

Source link

Market Snapshot: Woeful earnings threaten to intensify stock-market bloodbath

0

The prospect of four straight quarters of earnings declines is staring investors in the face on top of the worst multiweek selloff for stocks in years, and the worst start of the year ever.

For the year, the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, -2.39% and the S&P 500 index SPX, -2.16%  are down at least 8%, and the Nasdaq Composite Index COMP, -2.74%  shed more than 10%.

Read: U.S. stocks post worst 10-day start to a year in history

Stocks also rang up a third week of losses for their largest multiweek percentage drop since the four weeks ended Aug. 19, 2011, according to FactSet data. Over the past three weeks, both the S&P 500 and the Dow industrials have declined 8.9%, and the Nasdaq has fallen 11.1%. For the four weeks ended Aug. 19, 2011, the S&P 500 has fallen 16.5%, the Dow is down 14.7%, and the Nasdaq dropped 18.1%.

Also read: Which markets are closed on Martin Luther King Day?

Those hefty losses come as earnings season ramps up during the holiday-shortened week. Several companies on the S&P 500, along with seven Dow components, report quarterly results. And earnings season isn’t looking promising.

Total earnings for the S&P 500 in the fourth quarter are expected to decline from the previous year, even factoring that Wall Street forecasts’ have been lowered.

And read: Stock-market bloodbath wasn’t the bottom, indicator suggests

Over the past four years, estimates for S&P 500 earnings at the end of a given quarter have been an average three percentage points lower than the actual earnings results, according to John Butters, senior earnings analyst at FactSet.

Earnings were estimated to decline by 4.9% at the end of the fourth quarter, that would translate to a 1.9% decline if the average holds up. Currently, earnings are on pace for 5.7% drop.

Plus, current-quarter earnings estimates have taken a notable downturn in the past week.

First-quarter earnings for the S&P 500 are expected to decline from the year-ago period by 0.6%, compared with estimated growth of 0.9% at the beginning of the quarter, according to FactSet data.

Among Dow components: UnitedHealth Group Inc. UNH, -1.35%  and International Business Machines Corp. IBM, -2.17%  report Tuesday; Goldman Sachs Group Inc. GS, -3.58%  reports Wednesday; Verizon Communications Inc. VZ, -0.98% American Express Co. AXP, -0.60% and Travelers Cos. TRV, -1.76%  report Thursday; and General Electric Co. GE, -1.96%  reports Friday.

Notable earnings reports this week
Report date Company/ticker (FactSet EPS / revenue estimate)
Mon., Jan 18 U.S. markets closed for holiday
Tues., Jan. 19
  • IBM ($4.81 / $22.09 billion)
  • UnitedHealth ($1.25 / $43.28 billion)
  • Netflix Inc. NFLX, -2.82%  (2 cents / $1.83 billion)
  • Bank of America Corp. BAC, -3.54%  (27 cents / $20 billion)
  • Morgan Stanley MS, -4.35%  (33 cents / $7.54 billion)
  • Delta Air Lines Inc. DAL, -1.85%  ($1.19 / $9.61 billion)
Weds., Jan. 20
  • Goldman Sachs ($3.57 / $7.09 billion)
Thurs., Jan. 21
  • Verizon (88 cents / $34.11 billion)
  • American Express ($1.13 / $8.4 billion)
  • Travelers ($2.66 / $5.93 billion)
  • Starbucks Corp. SBUX, -1.66%  (45 cents / $5.4 billion)
  • Union Pacific Corp. UNP, -1.74%  ($1.42 / $5.45 billion)
Fri., Jan. 22
  • General Electric (49 cents / $36 billion)
  • Schlumberger SLB, -2.58%  (63 cents / $7.79 billion)

DC-area venture capital deals hit highest point since 2001 – Washington Post

0

[ad_1]


Tenable Network Security, a Columbia-based cybersecurity firm co-founded by Ron Gula (pictured), raised $250 million in venture capital last year. (Tim Teeling/Courtesy of Tenable Network Security)
Washington-area businesses raised more venture capital in the fourth quarter than they had in any quarter since 2001 — largely due to a few large deals.

The surge is not likely to be repeated soon given the recent stock market turmoil. Indeed, venture funding nationally declined during the period.

In all, though, 29 area companies received $556.22 million in venture capital last quarter, a 53 percent increase from a year earlier, according to a report released Friday by PricewaterhouseCoopers and the National Venture Capital Association, with data by Thomson Reuters.

For the full year, the region’s companies secured 169 deals totaling $1.41 billion, up from 197 deals totaling $1.09 billion in 2014. On average, the region’s firms received $8.4 million in venture capital in 2015, up from $5.5 million a year earlier.

“The average deal size was up, and it was up significantly,” said Brad Phillips, a director at PwC.

The flow of deals is likely to slow this year. Nationally, U.S. companies raised $11.34 billion in venture capital during the fourth quarter, a 28 percent decrease from the year before, as a wobbly stock market gave investors pause.

During the fourth quarter, “it appears the volatility in the financial markets affected [venture capital] funding,” Phillips said. “Equity market declines were broad-based.”

In Washington, however, fourth-quarter funding remained robust.

Tenable Network Security, a Columbia, Md.-based cybersecurity firm, led the way with a nearly $250 million investment from Accel Partners and Insight Venture Partners. It was the region’s second-largest deal in the report’s 20-year history. (The largest was for XM Satellite Radio Holdings in 1999 for $250 million, $100 more than the Tenable deal.)

“It’s a record-setting deal,” said Ron Gula, chief executive of Tenable. “Not only is this good for our company, it’s generally a really, really good message for the industry and our approach to doing cybersecurity.”

Tenable has plans to open six international offices this year, including in Ireland and the United Arab Emirates, Gula said. The company hired roughly 200 new employees last year, and plans to add even more workers in 2016.

“An investment of this size allows us to accelerate even faster,” he said.

Throughout the region, software and biotechnology companies continued to receive the largest share of venture capital, or about 84 percent of total dollars awarded during the fourth quarter.

The recipients of the largest deals included Precision for Medicine, a Bethesda, Md.-based biotechnology firm (which received $75 million); IronNet Cybersecurity, a Fulton, Md.-based software company ($25 million); and ZeroFox, a Baltimore software company ($22.04 million).

“It’s a pretty good quarter when the two traditionally strong industries went up and we still saw other industries land funding as well,” Phillips said.

Businesses in Maryland received 81.3 percent of fourth-quarter funding in the Washington area, which the report defines as Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia and the District.

Abha Bhattarai is a business reporter for The Washington Post. She has previously written for The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Reuters and the St. Petersburg Times.

[ad_2]

Source link

s2Member®