Sunday, May 11, 2025
Home Blog Page 69

U.S. Maps 1MDB Fraud Trail From Kuala Lumpur to Hollywood

0

More than $3.5 billion traveled a trail of fraud from Malaysia through a web of shell companies, with some fueling a spending binge on Monet paintings and luxury real estate and at least $700 million flowing back into accounts controlled by Malaysia’s prime minister.

Some of the money was handled by international banks including Goldman Sachs Group Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Standard Chartered Plc and Deutsche Bank AG. A chunk of it funded a Hollywood blockbuster, “The Wolf of Wall Street.” More than $13 million of it was wired to an account at a Las Vegas casino by a stepson of Malaysia’s prime minister who gambled with an unidentified actor whose description matches that of Leonardo DiCaprio.

It’s all laid out in a dozen filings Wednesday by U.S. prosecutors who detailed an alleged scheme of international money laundering and misappropriation stretching from 2009 to 2015. The Justice Department is seeking to seize more than $1 billion worth of assets it says went through U.S. banks from Malaysian development fund 1Malaysia Development Berhad, known as1MDB, and was ultimately used to illegally acquire assets.

Timeline: Malaysia’s Spiraling 1MDB State Fund Controversy

The U.S. complaints lays the groundwork for tension with Malaysia, a longtime ally on issues including counterterrorism and trade. Prosecutors refer to a top Malaysian official who controlled accounts that received hundreds of millions of dollars. The official isn’t accused of wrongdoing.

The anonymous description lines up with that of Prime Minister Najib Razak, who until a few months ago served as the chairman of 1MDB’s advisory board.

It’s unclear how local law enforcement will respond in Malaysia, where officials have taken pains to keep criticisms from surfacing, have cleared Najib of any wrongdoing and closed its own investigations. U.S. prosecutors sought to recover assets they linked to Najib’s stepson, Riza Aziz, and other associates.

The prime minister didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. He has consistently denied wrongdoing.

“Unfortunately and tragically, a number of corrupt officials treated this public trust as a personal bank account,” Attorney General Loretta Lynch said at a news conference in Washington. The civil action and asset seizures represent the “largest single action ever brought” by the Justice Department’s six-year-old Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Initiative, she said.

Lynch declined to comment on the identity of the unnamed top Malaysian official.

QuickTake Q&A: Malaysia’s 1MDB Fund Spawns Worldwide Probes

1MDB said in a statement that it will fully cooperate with investigators and had not been contacted by the Justice Department. It said it “is not a party to the civil suit, does not have any assets in the United States of America, nor has it benefited from the various transactions described in the civil suit.”

Also on Wednesday, Swiss authorities said U.S. prosecutors had sent them a request in May for information about bank accounts that might have been used to move money from the fund.

Web of Companies

The U.S. complaints also lay out how a handful of global banks, while not accused of wrongdoing, were ensnared as hundreds of millions bounced between a web of shell companies. Money was pilfered from the government fund based on false representations made by 1MDB officials and representatives of the shell companies, prosecutors said. Even when bank officials raised questions about the beneficiaries of various accounts, compliance departments were unable to detect or halt the alleged fraud.

The diverted cash was used to purchase a breathtaking catalog of loot that prosecutors moved on Wednesday to seize. There’s a stake in the Viceroy L’Ermitage Beverly Hills Hotel as well as homes, condos and penthouses from Los Angeles and Beverly Hills to Manhattan’s Central Park South to London’s Belgravia. There’s a $35 million Bombardier jet, as well as more than $200 million worth of art -- a pen-and-ink drawing by Vincent Van Gogh (“La Maison de Vincent a Arles”) and two Claude Monet paintings, including a pastel study of water lilies, “Nympheas Avec Reflets de Hautes Herbes.”

Hollywood Link

And in a twist worthy of Hollywood, the U.S. is also laying claim to profits and royalties from a movie about wealthy abandon: It says that more than $100 million in funds from 1MDB went to finance 2013’s “The Wolf of Wall Street,” by Red Granite Pictures Inc. -- a production company co-founded by Najib’s stepson, Riza.

1MDB in April said it had “never invested in nor transferred funds to Red Granite Pictures, whether directly or via intermediaries,” and has denied wrongdoing more broadly over its finances. Red Granite said in May that all money it received had been proper and from a variety of sources including top-tier U.S. commercial and investment banks.

Jho Low Coterie

At the heart of the scheme, the U.S. alleges, was a small coterie of Malaysians led by a Malaysian financier named Low Taek Jho. They diverted money from 1MDB into personal accounts disguised to look like legitimate businesses, the U.S. said, and kicked back some of those funds to officials. Low, who has been linked socially with Paris Hilton and is a close friend of Riza, has said he provided consulting to 1MDB that didn’t break any laws.

In one of the complaints filed in federal court in California, running 136 pages, federal prosecutors alleged the unnamed top official whose description matches Najib’s received payments of $20 million in 2011, $30 million in late 2012 and then $681 million in March 2013. In August 2013, prosecutors said, some $620 million was transferred out of the top official’s account and back into an account controlled by one of the defendants in the U.S. actions.

Najib stepped down from his role as chairman of 1MDB’s advisory board when it wasdissolved in May. He is also the country’s finance minister. The Ministry of Finance is the sole shareholder of 1MDB.

The Malaysian attorney general said this year that the $681 million that appeared in Najib’s accounts before the 2013 election was a personal contribution from the Saudi royal family and that most was later returned. He cleared Najib of wrongdoing. Saudi Foreign Minister Adel Al-Jubeir said in April that the large donation to Najib was “genuine,” and Saudi authorities were aware of the gift which came without strings.

The Justice Department account contradicts that statement. The $681 million came from Tanore, an entity controlled by a friend and associate of Low’s. Najib paid the money back to Tanore, according to the complaint.

Three Phases

The Malaysia fund is at the center of several international investigations into alleged corruption and money laundering by public officials. Prosecutors in at least four countries -- Singapore, Switzerland, Luxembourg and the U.S. -- are looking into money flows from the investment vehicle, which was established for national development.

The suspected fraud occurred in three phases in which money was laundered through bank accounts in Singapore, Switzerland, Luxembourg and the U.S., prosecutors said.

In 2009, after 1MDB was set up to pursue development projects, officials of 1MDB and others, under the pretense of investing in a joint venture between 1MDB and a Saudi oil company, transferred more than $1 billion to a Swiss bank account, according to the Justice Department.

In 2012, 1MDB officials and others diverted proceeds raised through two separate bond offerings arranged by Goldman Sachs Group Inc., according to the Justice Department. More than 40 percent of the proceeds, or $1.4 billion, were transferred to a Swiss bank account belonging to a British Virgin Islands entity. More than $1 billion was diverted from another bond offering arranged by Goldman Sachs in 2013.

Goldman Ties

Goldman Sachs, which enjoyed a lucrative relationship with 1MDB, did the bidding for fund officials even as many Goldman employees questioned whether Low was involved, prosecutors said. The bank also circulated misleading offering statements when raising money for 1MDB, though the complaint doesn’t indicate that Goldman employees were aware of whether the statements were misleading.

Goldman Sachs said in a statement: “We helped raise money for a sovereign wealth fund that was designed to invest in Malaysia. We had no visibility into whether some of those funds may have been subsequently diverted to other purposes.”

Compliance ‘Overkill’

E-mails and recorded phone calls between 1MDB and several banks show how billions of dollars were siphoned out of 1MDB accounts under false pretenses, according to the complaints, underscoring the weaknesses of bank compliance systems.

A handful of global banks were used to shift money improperly without confirming who the recipients were, other than information provided by 1MDB, according to the complaint. At times, when compliance officers raised questions, they were brushed aside and the transfers were eventually approved.

In one phone call cited in the documents, prosecutors say a 1MDB employee pressed a Deutsche Bank supervisor to approve transfers into Swiss accounts, complaining he was “under tremendous pressure” to get the deal done.

“Let me must convince my compliance person,” the Deutsche Bank employee said, according to prosecutors. ”It’s a little bit sticky with this.”

”They cannot wait for this, you know,” the 1MDB official added. ”If they’re going to overkill on the compliance thing, uh, they have to be responsible, you know.”

The transaction went through.

Deutsche Bank declined to comment as did JPMorgan, which was also mentioned in the documents. Standard Chartered said it is cooperating with all relevant investigations and declined to comment further.

Art Purchases

Low or his associates used some of the misappropriated funds to buy artworks, the complaint alleges. Low then used part of his collection -- which he valued at more than $300 million, according to an e-mail cited in the complaint -- as collateral for a loan from Sotheby’s Financial Services, a unit of Sotheby’s.

He used 17 pieces, including the two Monets and the Van Gogh, to secure a loan of $107 million loan that went to a company owned by Low, according to the complaint.

By May 2016, Sotheby’s had recovered enough from the sale of several works pledged as collateral to cover the outstanding balance of the loan, according to the complaint. Then Sotheby’s released its security interest in the artwork, it said. As of June 7, Sotheby’s still had the three works in its possession, according to the complaint.

Sotheby spokeswoman Lauren Gioia said the company always cooperates with government investigations. “As set forth in the complaint, Sotheby’s has no continuing security interest or relationship to the three works that are the subject of the action, and is not in a position to comment on any potential seizure,” she said.

Vegas Trip

Low and Riza were also at the center of a gambling spree in Las Vegas in July 2012, using money that had come through 1MDB, according to prosecutors. A few weeks after Riza wired $41 million from a Red Granite account to one controlled by an associate, Eric Tan, the two of them went to Vegas, where over several days they wired $13 million into an account maintained by Las Vegas Sands Corp., the parent of the Venetian Casino.

Sands, which hasn’t been accused of wrongdoing, declined to comment.

The two of them -- joined by Low and a producer of the “Wolf of Wall Street” -- gambled at the Venetian for three days. They were joined on July 15 by what the complaint identifies as a lead actor in the film, who it noted ultimately won a Golden Globe award for his performance.

That actor is DiCaprio, who isn’t accused of wrongdoing. His publicist, Shawn Sachs, didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

The case is U.S. v. “Wolf of Wall Street,” 16-05362, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Source link

Former Attorney General Will Work With Airbnb To Address Discrimination

0
Airbnb, the popular site that lets people rent rooms and houses, is hoping to fight racism and discrimination on its platform — and it's recruited former Attorney General Eric Holder to help.The company has spent more than a month reviewing its policies, after widespread reports of a pattern of bias against people of color looking to rent rooms.

The review is still ongoing, the company said in a blog post Wednesday, but they've already started taking some steps to address the problem, including bringing in Holder and other experts to help write a new anti-discrimination policy.

The site also plans to offer training about "unconscious bias" to more hosts, and hire employees "whose full-time job will be to detect and address instances of discrimination."

This spring, NPR's Hidden Brain explored the issue of racial bias on Airbnb. Quirtina Crittenden, a user on the site, described getting declined for room after room — until she changed her profile image to a landscape photo, and shortened her name to "Tina." After that, getting a room was no problem.

Researchers have found a widespread pattern of racial discrimination on Airbnb. Here's Hidden Brain:

"Michael Luca and his colleagues Benjamin Edelman and Dan Svirsky at Harvard Business School ... sent out 6,400 requests to real AirBnb hosts in five major American cities—Baltimore, Dallas, Los Angeles, St. Louis, and Washington.

"All the requests were exactly the same except for the names they gave their make-believe travelers. Some had African American-sounding names like Jamal or Tanisha and others had stereotypically white-sounding names like Meredith or Todd.

"Luca and his colleagues found requests with African American sounding names were roughly 16 percent less likely to be accepted than their white-sounding counterparts. They found discrimination across the board: among cheap listings and expensive listings, in diverse neighborhoods and homogenous neighborhoods, and with novice hosts as well as experienced hosts. They also found that black hosts were also less likely to accept requests from guests with African American-sounding names ...

"In a separate study, Luca and his colleagues have found that guests discriminate, too, and black hosts earn less money on their properties on Airbnb."

Another study found that Asian-American hosts make less money than white ones.

When NPR's Code Switch reached out to individual Asian-American hosts, they said they didn't feel like race played a factor in their room prices. But researchers examining the issue — like researchers looking into bias against black Airbnb users — noted that subconscious bias can play a powerful role in decision-making.

In the company's Wednesday blog post on the issue, Airbnb co-founder Brian Chesky opened by mourning the recent shootings in Minnesota, Louisiana and Texas, and expressing support for both the Black Lives Matter movement and for police officers. He continued:

"We aren't so naïve to think that one company can solve these problems, but we understand that we have an obligation to be honest about our own shortcomings, and do more to get our house in order. That's why we've been talking more openly about discrimination and bias on our platform, and are currently engaged in a process to prevent it. ...

"We will not simply 'address the issue' by doing the least required for liability and PR purposes. I want us to be smart and innovative and to create new tools to prevent discrimination and bias that can be shared across the industry."

Former Attorney General Holder will be assisting as outside counsel, working with civil rights attorney John Relman to help write a new anti-discrimination policy.

In a statement, Holder said he's looking forward to helping Airbnb "craft policies that will be the model for companies who share Airbnb's commitment to diversity and inclusion."

Airbnb says they will require all users to read and commit to the policy.

Chesky also admits that the company has failed on this issue in the past — with inadequate transparency, and with a "lack of urgency" on addressing discrimination.

"Joe [Gebbia], Nate [Blecharczyk], and I started Airbnb with the best of intentions, but we weren't fully conscious of this issue when we designed the platform," Chesky wrote. "I promise you that we have learned from the past and won't repeat our prior mistakes and delays."

Source link

Qualcomm earnings beat with $6B in revenue and $1.16 EPS

0

Following the bell today, Qualcomm reported earnings for its third fiscal quarter of 2016 that met analyst expectations in terms of earnings per share, and exceeded expectations in terms of revenue. The company attributed its results to progress with the number of licensees in China.

For the quarter ending June 26, the San Diego, California-based semiconductor and telecommunications products maker posted net income of $1.44 billion, up 22 percent from $1.18 billion.

Non-GAAP revenue surged 3.6 percent to $6.04 billion, or $1.16 cents per share, up from $5.8 billion a year ago.

Analysts had been expecting Qualcomm to report per-share earnings of 97 cents on revenue of $5.58 billion.

“We are continuing to make progress in our licensing business and expect that momentum to continue,” said Steve Mollenkopf, CEO of Qualcomm Incorporated, during a conference call.

Right after the CEO’s statement, president Derek Aberle explained that Qualcomm is continuing to execute new license agreements in China, and that the company is still actively negotiating with the key remaining Chinese OEMs.

Mollenkopf added that regulators around the world are beginning to allocate spectrum for 5G consistent with the company’s 5G design and development effort: “Recent spectrum regulatory decisions and movement in the U.S. and Europe, combined with progress on the spectrum regulatory front in China, Japan and Korea, are good indications that the world is preparing for 5G.”

For the nine months ending in June 2016, Qualcomm posted net income of $4.11 billion, or $2.74 per diluted share, down 2.4 percent from $4.21 billion, or $2.53 per share in the 2015 comparable period. Revenues decreased 12.4 percent to $17.37 billion from $19.83 billion the year before.

In after-market trading, Qualcomm shares were up 6.8 percent after the earnings announcement.

Source link

Unilever Buys Dollar Shave Club in Reported $1 Billion Deal

0

 

Michael Dubin will remain CEO of the company. YouTube: Dollar Shave Club

Being a disrupter might land you a billion dollar deal. That's the case for Dollar Shave Club, which has reached an agreement with Unilever for the consumer packaged goods giant to acquire the male grooming company for a reported $1 billion price tag.

Founded in 2012, Dollar Shave Club initially made headlines for its pithy advertising, which featured the company's CEO Michael Dubin as an endearingly passionate pitchman arguing that consumers didn't need brand name razors.

The work, which was created by the company's in-house creatives and continued to feature Dubin prominently, became a point of differentiation for Dollar Shave Club beyond its mail-order business model.

It makes sense then that the company's advertising strategy will stay in-house, instead of shifting to one of Unilever's myriad agencies once it is under Unilever's brand umbrella. "Things aren't changing," according to a spokeswoman for the Dollar Shave Club.

Unilever declined to comment beyond its press release.

"If Unilever is smart it won't muck with it," said Allen Adamson, founder of Brand Simple Consulting. "Typically, with an acquisition like this, most companies will homogenize the company they acquire and force their way of doing things on it, force them to use their agencies, do it their way and in doing it that way they miss a big opportunity to change how they market and how they advertise."

He added: "Because it's such a different business I don't think they're going to do that here. They will let it do what made it successful and see how they can help."

Patrick Collins, CEO of Grace Blue Acquisitions doesn't think Dollar Shave Club should be "worried that [their] ad approach or brand would be limited by this acquisition. Looking at their experience with Axe, Unilever has allowed that brand to flourish and have fun, which is proof for DSC that when a brand and a message work, Unilever leaves it alone."

Britt Bulla, senior director of strategy for branding firm Siegel + Gale agreed. "I think it's not going to change much," said Bulla, noting that the brand experience of Dollar Shave Club might be more important than its advertising strategy. "If Unilever keeps that pure I'm not worried; if Unilever doesn't, they probably lose a customer."

Since it was founded five years ago Dollar Shave Club has grown significantly; it now has 3.2 million members and it made $152 million in sales last year. The company has also evolved from solely a razor subscription service, adding a skin care line and other grooming products as well as its own men's lifestyle site, Mel.

"Dollar Shave Club is an innovative and disruptive male grooming brand with incredibly deep connections to its diverse and highly engaged consumers," said Kees Kruythoff, president of Unilever North America in a statement.

He added: "In addition to its unique consumer and data insights, Dollar Shave Club is the category leader in its direct-to-consumer space. We plan to leverage the global strength of Unilever to support Dollar Shave Club in achieving its full potential in terms of offering and reach."

Dubin will remain CEO of the company. "DSC couldn't be happier to have the world's most innovative and progressive consumer-product company in our corner," said Dubin in a statement.

Source link

ES Morning Update July 20th 2016

0

b6795924-4e25-473e-8954-5c44f90c8e29

Busted through the falling trendline (in green) of resistance and made a double top.

MACD's still no clue on this 60 minute chart.

Really not a lot to say today that wasn't said yesterday.  We are still in a sideways chop zone from 2150-2165... which is either consolidation for a huge rip higher (like 2300) or distribution, and I think the latter.  With the extremely bullish sentiment out there by the retail traders I just don't see some huge rally starting from here.  If everyone is bullish, and therefore have already positioned themselves long, and all the bears are asleep, who's going to be buying this rally to fuel it up higher?  Bears need to be short to be squeezed, and/or bulls need to be in cash looking to buy.  That's not the case here.  Everyone is long.  It's just a matter of time before this rolls over in my opinion.  This week or next, it's really about how many days are still needed for the insiders to unload their longs.  Once they are done the rug will be pulled out on this market and down she'll go...

The VIX (and it's related double and triple ETF's) is getting killed and hit extreme levels at the close yesterday.  The last time the level was this low was an intraday spike down on 08/05/2015 where it hit 10.88, but closed at 12.51... which was just 19 days ahead of the mini-crash on the 24th.  The market continued to chop some more from the 5th the 18th when it finally started the big crash wave move down.  If that repeats itself here then we could have another 11 days of until the big drop starts.  That would be August 4th (as those are "Trading Days", not "Calendar Days").  Due not those that between the 5th and the 18th of August in 2015 the market did start down as it broke out of it's trading range to expand it much larger.  Then the final squeeze back up was on the FOMC day, which we have another this coming July 27th.  We could see some downward movement into that date, then a pop up higher intraday (to squeeze out some bears) followed by the start of the big drop over the next few days.

You know... if only "they" would tell us their plans in advance it would certainly make it easier to know when to go short.  But gangsters like the Fed are always out to trick the sheep and steal their money it seems.  If this truly is their plan then I'd look for the range to expand from the current top down to the 2125 area, then back up to the top (or near) again before the meeting.  The period between now and then should set up a series of waves that will lead to some large wave 3 of 3 of C down (or something like that) just like the waves did right before the August 24th 2015 mini-crash.  So, hang in their bears... your time is near.

ES Morning Update July 19th 2016

0

4d43968c-fe74-4375-b878-a08831ee5c3d

Futures chopping sideways making lower highs with resistance overhead from the falling (green) trendline and support at the horizontal (yellow) trendline around 2143.25

MACD's going negative but still basically flat-lined on this 60 minute chart.  However, the 6 hour chart is pointing down nicely, falling from a +15 area high to +5 currently.

From the looks of the chart today it appears we'll be range-bound between resistance (green line) and support (yellow line), pushing the breakout or breakdown out to Wednesday or possibly Thursday.  When I look at the SPX Cash charts I see them also needing one or two more days to make a move.  Pattern wise the wedge the futures are in could be viewed as bullish as it's consolidation... or distribution, which would be bearish.  One could argue for either and be right I guess, but only when it final breaks one direction or the other will we know which.  With all the other charts I look at I have to think we'll breakdown from the wedge... probably Wednesday.  If so, then I'd look for 2125 for support where the 23.6% Fibonacci Level is at, then 2096 for the 38.2%, but I'd look for the zone of 2090-2095 if we go that low, as there good horizontal support there.

On the upside (if we breakout over the green falling trendline) we could go to the 2175 zone.  I have to exclude that as possible as even-though it seems unlikely from the overbought charts and extreme bullishness we all know how crazy and manipulated these markets are... which means "they" really can "walk on water" (push the market up against the grain).  But assuming "they" don't, then we should be range-bound all day today with a float down early and back up later on... ideally closing green a little, close to the falling trendline.  That would setup Wednesday (or Thursday) for a breakdown of the lower horizontal support line yellow.  While this sideways chop looks bullish to most, as it appears to be consolidation, I think the big boys are selling up here and getting ready for the next move down.  While I don't know if the all time high is in or not I think a pullback is long overdue and coming this week.

Chaos erupts on GOP convention floor as anti-Trump delegates make final move

0


CLEVELAND — The Republican National Convention was thrown into disarray Monday as delegates opposing Donald Trump made their final stand.

The Colorado delegation walked out of the GOP convention floor after delegates seeking a roll-call vote to change the rules were denied.

At around 4 p.m. ET, the convention's rules were put up for a vote, and the Stop Trump movement wanted to force a roll-call vote to try and change the rules so they could come up with a new nominee.

However, the party passed the rules with a voice vote.

Ken Cuccianelli, the former Virginia attorney general and a leader in the movement to stop Trump's nomination, told MSNBC "this is infuriating to watch."

"Here we've got [the] RNC trampling over their own grassroots delegates, and for most of us here, this is about getting good grassroots rules and getting a voice in the vote," he said. "They cheated."

This is just another source of tension surrounding the RNC.

Outside of the convention, there are several anti-Trump protests expected throughout the week, with some already taking place Monday.

The city of Cleveland was awarded a $50 million federal grant for security during the convention.

That said, Monday's defeat of the anti-Trump movement's last-ditch effort clears the path for the business magnate to be the GOP standard bearer.

Netflix poor subscriber rates likely a bump in the road, say analysts

0
Netflix app on a mobile phone

Netflix app on a mobile phone

Despite reporting Q2 subscriber rates that missed expectations, most analysts think Netflix's growth trajectory will improve sooner or later.

The company reported in its Q2 letter to shareholders on Monday that it added 1.7 million subscribers, a steep drop from its forecast of 2.5 million. The U.S. added 160,000 subscribers compared to projection of 500,000, while international subscriber additions totaled 1.5 million compared to the 2.0 million forecast. The stock, already down year-to-date, sank in the after hours, dropping more than 15 percent.

The company said that while total additions were on target, the unsubscribing rate was "up slightly and unexpectedly." Netflix claimed the churn was tied to press coverage in April around its plans to raise prices for long-term members, saying that consumers thought the price effect would occur immediately instead of over a longer period. (The price increase should be completed by the end of the year, the company said on its earnings call.)

Despite missing its guidance, Netflix's quarterly earnings beat expectations. It posted second quarter earnings of 9 cents per share, compared to 6 cents per share year over year. Revenue was at $2.11 billion, compared to $1.65 billion the year prior.

Thompson Reuters consensus estimate was $2.11 billion in revenue, with the company expected to post earnings of 2 cents a share.

Still, many analysts are undeterred. EMarketer senior analyst Paul Verna said Netflix is on the right path, but the fact it is so subscription-based makes its model a little more risky than their competitors like Amazon or YouTube, which have more kinds of revenue streams.

"Amazon has a lot of money to invest in content," said Verna. "They're not looking for the content subscriptions on their own. They're looking to drive e-commerce, and content is part of a much bigger strategy. For Netflix, content is everything."

Mike Goodman, director of digital media strategies for Strategy Analytics, said this earnings report was especially telling for Netflix considering it hasn't met expectations for two quarters. Goldman said Netflix had hit its saturation point for subscribers in the U.S., but the real sign for growth was among international numbers. With lower than expected rates in that realm, the future is a bit murkier for Netflix.

"I don't want to paint a major black cloud over the top of Netflix," Goodman said. "In general, I think they are very strong company, but they're facing growing pains."

The company also has a potential goldmine in distribution revenue if it continues to produce original content that people want to watch.

The model echoes HBO's business plan, said TruOptik CEO Andre Swanson. It wasn't until the network released "The Sopronos" in 1999 — 27 years after it launched — did it start deriving revenue from original content.

"Syndication has historically been a big part of the television industry – and you have to think of Netflix as a television channel. They're not an over-the-air broadcaster. They're distribution channel is online in terms of the way they operate their business, but their ability to own content helps them better monetize. "

Already, Netflix has developed a respectable slate of original series like "Orange is the New Black," "House of Cards" and "Making A Murderer." It confirmed that it it would continue to do so. These shows and movies can be a draw for international viewers attracted to English-language programming, and can help increase subscriber rates. It also gives Netflix a large opportunity for TV distribution rights revenue in different countries.

In addition, the company is working on developing more non-English language series and films in more than a dozen countries, including Brazil, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Columbia, South Korea, Argentina and Spain. Earlier this year, it announced a deal with Univision to broadcast "Narcos," (which is mostly in Spanish, as well as a joint production for an upcoming "El Chapo" series.

Still, it could be little longer until we see Netflix's true potential.

"[Distribution revenue] is another one of those things that doesn't show up immediately," Verna said.

ES Morning Update July 18th 2016

0

e61eac45-f057-409b-a696-9b5cc988dd12

Looking at the charts this morning they look like the bulls are going to take a rest today.  While the market is set to open green the MACD's are flatlined on this 60 minute chart and the higher time frame charts show a topping and rolling over on them.  This suggests the upside today will be small until a decision is made on going higher after a rest or pulling back some this week.  Hard too fight these bulls as they may still want to go higher?  And of course any dip will likely be bought so today might just be a "pause" day where the bulls don't gain too much ground, nor the bears.

Over on the SPX Cash charts (different time frames) they all show overbought conditions at extreme levels but we all know the market can stay overbought for a very long time.  I get the feeling that we're going to need some type of news event to get the selling started as the techncials don't show anything new today (just more overbought) then they did last week.  Wave count wise as I said Friday we appear to be in a 5th wave up of some kind, or a 3rd that is dividing.  If a 3rd then today's sideways action could make the 4th wave and allow the 5th wave to continue up tomorrow or later this week.  I'm not much into Elliottwave as it's too much of an "afterwards" style of analysis, and not something that can be used successfully to forecast the future.

Not much else to cover here.  I'll put up a new chart in the chartroom should we get some kind of movement whereas I can see something in the technicals to give us a better forecast.  Until then we just have watch the paint dry I guess...

ES Morning Update July 15th 2016

0

2f647a38-d509-4b57-9ff4-1aacb0e9759a

Ok guys... finally there appears to be some weakness showing up in this bull run! Yippeeee!  As you can see for the first time since the two 2100 tops we've had a pullback afterhours in this 60 minute ES Futures chart.  In the chatroom yesterday I showed you all a chart with the most likely wave count.  I also showed you a new FP on the VIX I got yesterday.  So if that wave count is correct (not that I'm a big fan of EW but it does add to TA) then we had a small wave 4 down afterhours/premarket and are now in the final 5th wave up inside the larger C wave up... which should be the last wave in this BREXIT low rally.  I think we'll hit the VIX FP at the same time this 5th ends... which could be at the end the day today?  Who knows when?

Over the weekend and early next week we have turn dates from various places/sources/etc... with one being on the 17th, another the 18th-21st and some coded stuff that I think points to 7.16.16 as important.  So while most bears are toast now, underwater in every position they have, it now (Finally) is looking like a good short.  With the wave count looking aligned, the new VIX FP, and the turn dates over the weekend and early next week (Plus the RNC on the 18th where they will choose Trump as their choice to represent their party for President) there's a lot of things to favor the bears here.  All in all it's looking good for top of some kind that will give us a multiday pullback, so bears (if you aren't all sleeping) might want to think about a short today.

If we have an important top today then we should pullback most of next week if my ABC wave count from the 1980 low turns into a 5 wave pattern, whereas then the pullback will be a larger wave 4 down and larger 5 wave up will be yet to come.  This would also change my larger wave C up to a larger wave 3 up... but the smaller wave 5 up is still valid as it would then just be inside a larger wave 3 up instead of larger wave C up.  (Refer to the chart I posted in the chatroom yesterday if you need to see the arrows drawn for the various waves).  Regardless of the depth of the pullback we are looking good for one to start next week, probably as early as Monday.  If this move up turns into an ABC instead of a 5 wave pattern then the pullback could lower then the 1980 recent low... if only a larger wave 4 down then it shouldn't break 2100 next week.

ES Morning Update July 14th 2016

0

The futures continue higher, wiping out more and more bears.  At this point they really might be headed to the 230 SPY FP from late last year, it's just too hard too believe right now.

41208018-dcde-4707-a450-a12787a1774b

There's a rising trendline of resistance overhead that the futures came close to this premarket, which could be enough resistance to allow a pullback.  But right now there's seems to be nothing stopping the bulls as they gap up, trade sideways all day and ram it up again overnight to gap up the following day to do it all over again.  I'm sure I'm not the only bear out there that didn't see this coming and is now drowning.

So, at this point I just will watch and wait patiently as chasing this bull is futile.  If it goes to 230 on the SPY (2300 SPX) I'll just watch it happen without me.  Not that I'm a stubborn bear but more like "I can't believe the rally will continue", so why chase it?  It's not going up on traders going long, it's going up on bears' having to buy back their shorts at a loss.  Unfortunately those bears keep shorting on ever move higher.

Anyway, that rising trendline is all I see as overhead resistance.  Other then that we are in uncharted waters overhead so the upside is unlimited.  The downside levels aren't worth calling out right now as I'm sure every bear knows them anyway.  I'm pretty tire of chasing this bull so I'm just going to sit on my hands and watch until he tires out.  Then I'm going to kill him and eat him!  🙂

ES Morning Update July 13th 2016

0

6f4933ce-a325-4b23-8500-80d9d15eea46

Futures finally are looking like they are tiring out a little this morning they are just barely green.  Yesterday I pointed out a pattern of 1,2,3 tops then drop and we are just looking for that 3rd top to show up and stop, which is where we will have good odds of a pullback.  It looks like it "might" have completed yesterday but I'm not positive as the "tops" are hard too point out due to the pullbacks on them being so small.  But considering that this is option expiration week (normally bullish) and our next turn dates are the 18th-21st we might not see much of any down move this week, but instead just some sideways chop to frustrate the bulls and bears alike.  Today looks like it "wants" to be a pause day where it just chops sideways until it hits that rising trendline of support around the close.

Some of the various charts I look at now show extreme levels that have never been hit before.  Bullishness is beyond extreme and the $NYHGH at 564.00 is at an unbelievable reading.  And strangely many of the longer term charts appear bullish now, like the monthly and weekly.  But it's common for them to look bullish or bearish and not turn the other way until half (or all) the move is over with, so I don't buy into those readings yet.

For now though the market still moving up and very hard too read without some pullback to see some divergences setup, trendline of support or resistance to form, wave count to appear, or something other then a rocket ship to the moon.  I think we'll see one or more of those things by the end of this week but it sure it hard to watch every day these gap ups and sideways moves the rest of the day.  Not much else to add.  I'm just waiting on some clouds in the sky to forecast a rainy day is coming, but right now it's sunny every day with zero clouds.

ES Morning Update July 12th 2016

0

2e4c37db-638d-4332-95ac-271613615630

1,2,3 tops then pullback

Yesterday I pointed out that the common thing that the market usually does is to go up 10-20 points higher then the prior top before pulling back, and it's looking likely that we'll see the SPX cash up in that range today from the looks of the futures.  If history repeats itself then we "should" see a top today and few days of a pullback like the July 1st to 6th pullback.  Of course if too many bears have caught on to this pattern we could see them stretch it higher, but hopefully that's not the case.  Certainly this rally has wiped out a ton of bears and fooled the masses once again... including myself.  I honestly did not believe the market could go up this high this fast, but there was an inverted head and shoulders pattern in the charts... it's just that I didn't think it could play out with all the technical damage done from BREXIT (which is mostly gone now... LOL).

Calling tops in this market is very very hard as it's rigged to the upside, whereas the bottoms are easier to pick as they are usually "V" formations.  Even if they are not, they are still easier to find because those that run the market want it up much more often then they want it down... hence the reason why the market is bullish 80% of the time and bearish only 20% of the time.  Anyway, it is what it is and can't fight it.  With the Fed always manipulating the market to keep it a float you just have to go with them until they stop.  And right now they seem hell bent on preventing a crash later this summer... which I'm sure is political.  Maybe they succeed... I just don't know?  But I do think we still have another serious correction coming very soon and while it might not take out the 1800 level I do see us getting close to it again, which then the Fed's might come in and save the fat pig again.

Ok, for the market today.  There is a 3 top pattern I've noticed that happens a lot, whereas you'll see a top, tiny pullback, another squeeze up to top again, one more tiny pullback and then one more final squeeze to get out the last bear... then a decent move down.  We've had that many times as noted on this chart.  While it doesn't guarantee you that it will repeat again it's all I have right now to make an analysis on.  If it works again then we could (should) see a pullback to the 2100 area in the next few days where big support is at.  At that point you can certainly expect some trapped bears (if there are any left alive?) to exit, which would also cause a bounce back up.  Of course on the upside there's really no limit as we are in uncharted territory now.  So around 2155 on the SPX cash would be 20 points higher then the 2135 May 2015 prior high.  Let's see if they reach and tire out like they've done so many times before.

ES Morning Update July 11th 2016

0

2b3add2c-6c6a-4a4b-a711-fdae0112864f

The futures are still grinding higher this Monday morning after a huge squeeze to new all time highs last Friday.  This likely because the cash index for both the DOW and the S&P500 did not quite make it up to new all time high Friday, but should today from the looks of the futures.  In the past when new all time highs were made it was common to pierce through them 10-20 points before reversing back down.  If they go much above that then the bears could be in for some serious trouble and that "might" start some huge rally to 2300 or more.  For now though we have to look at the technical picture and it suggests a pullback will happen from this double top just like they do with most other double tops.  This "should" be a fake out move up to take out the last bear and lure in the last bull.  I will say though that this market is getting harder and harder to forecast as previous patterns don't seem to work as much today, and moves in either direction are being stretched further then expected.

The goal for SkyNet is to get everyone bullish and all the bears out before dropping the market.  I'd hoped that happened on Friday but falling short a few points of new all times on the DOW and S&P500 cash indexes must have prevent it.  I also thought we might pullback today and grind back up to make this slightly higher high later this week, like Wednesday or Thursday, but it will likely happen today from the looks of the futures.  In the past we saw the bulls get up to a new high and chop around for several days before giving up and let the bears have some fun.  Back in mid-May of 2015 when that all time high was put in we saw 5 days of chop before a drop... which might happen here too.  This again points to later this week before the pullback happening.  As long as I see chop and no more then 20 points or so over the 2135 SPX high last year I'll stick with the plan that we'll rollover and not march on up to 2300 or so.

In this crazy trading market today it's always wise to layer into positions, which is why I take longs or shorts in stages, or partial positions.  I'll look for my final partial position this week after we first make a new all time high, pullback some and then retest back up again with a lower high.  As far as levels go, they should be obvious... the 2100 area is now horizontal support on the downside and there's nothing on the upside yet worth mentioning.  No trendline created at this point but I'm sure there's some Fibonacci levels if one wants to research it.  I'll stick with about 20 points higher as my point of reference.  Again, I'm expecting the bulls to chop around up here for several days to frustrate the bears.  Once the bears finally throw in the towel we should start moving lower for several weeks.  This is option expiration week, which is normally bullish, but this time I think it will be choppy until it rolls over later in the week.

ES Morning Update July 8th 2016

0

1ce78466-6737-4faa-aa96-6b9150c472da

Rising trendline of resistance could be rode up early this morning

Rising trendline of support still isn't anywhere near breaking down

MACD's on this 60 minute chart could run up for at least half the day before getting overbought

Negative Divergences are setting up everywhere. Both on this ES Futures chart and the SPX cash.  This suggests a down move is coming after first tricking the bulls into going long to trap them.  Bears should not go to sleep here as a turn back down is very close.  Today's job data could very well end up being the "turn date"?  False breakouts are common near the end of a move and this looks a lot more like the end of a rally then the start of one.  The technical's just don't support the "Inverted Head and Shoulders" pattern that's formed now.  Many times these are false breakouts done to squeeze out the last bear and get the bulls fully long.  I think that's the case here too.

Looking at the breakthrough we just had from the jobs data news we've cleared out many bears that had their stops right above the horizontal resistance zone of 2100.  This doesn't mean we'll rollover right at the open as new bears will short it, and I wouldn't be surprised if we dipped some early on and then came back up later in the day to wipe-out today's bears as well.  SkyNet is very quick to adapt as we traders pick up on it's patterns, and as soon as we do it will change them.  Meaning the "short the gap up" move that used too work all the time in the past doesn't work as much today because so many people figured it out.  While taking a short up near the open for the bigger picture is still wise in my opinion we might get a better spot later in the day.

Layering in shorts is what I've had to do over the last year as we are in a very, very manipulated period where things get extended out longer then one can believe.  I'll be watching early on today to see if this pulls back and appears to be the real move or just some dip before one more move up late in the day.  Personally I think we don't roll until the afternoon session.  So don't fall for this upside breakout as being some new rally, it's very likely the end of one.  While no one can guarantee some directional change will happen on this date or that date the charts are telling us that a turn back down is near.  But give this some time to roll as I don't see it happening early in the day.

ES Morning Update July 6th 2016

0

6c034111-3e21-4fed-9c84-a059ac9b7485

The futures are now in a nice falling channel.

The MACD's are having a tough time turning back up because the larger time frames are still pointing down.

So far it's looking good for this move down to continue to the 2060 area (or lower).  The 38.2% Fib. pullback level is around 2055 so I'd look for the 2055-2060 to be the first support and most likely bounce zone.  I will add this though... lately it seems that SkyNet doesn't give us that many decent bounces or dips (the B waves or 2's and 4's) but instead just continues in one direction for a much bigger move then most people expect.  The huge squeeze up last week was a perfect example, but it's been happening a lot lately... especially the last 1-2 years.  It's like the typical retracement levels aren't typical anymore.  Instead we see 78.6% moves or 90-95% moves, then a reversal.

Anyway, I'd look to exit shorts today at some point, but it might be some slow drift lower all day that quietly drops without waking up the bears.  That seems to be the scheme these days, or to just drop it off a cliff like the BREXIT move, which is too fast for the bears to see coming.  That implies that the bounce coming will either be very weak (like 23.8% Fib.?) or another big squeeze that might even double top the 2100 high last Friday.  Personally I think the bounce will be small as there are many gaps below that needed filled but it's best to just take this one day at a time.  I would NOT go long when we hit the support zone as we are still in a bear market and bounces are best shorted, instead of trading to the upside.

On the SPX it should be in the 2065 area I believe.  On the SPY it's the 206.50 zone.  Calling an exact level is tough, so I just give you ranges and then we try to get closer during the day in the chatroom when possible.  As you all know most of the volume is in the first couple of hours in the day and the last hour of the day, which is why many tops and bottoms seem to appear then.  Nothing more to add that wasn't said yesterday.  Have a great day.

Pope Francis says Church should apologize to gays

0

pope

Pope Francis, flanked by Vatican spokesman Federico Lombardi, addressed journalists on the flight back from Armenia

Pope Francis has said that the Roman Catholic Church should apologize to gay people for the way it has treated them.

He told reporters that the Church had no right to judge the gay community, and should show them respect.

Pope Francis, flanked by Vatican spokesman Federico Lombardi, talks to journalists on flight back to Vatican, at end of three-day visit to Armenia, Sunday, June 26

The pontiff also said the Church should seek forgiveness from other people it had marginalized - women, the poor, and children forced into labor.

The Pope has been hailed by many in the gay community for his positive attitude towards homosexuals.

But some conservative Catholics have criticized him for making comments they say are ambiguous about sexual morality.

Speaking to reporters on his plane returning from Armenia, the Pope said: "I will repeat what the catechism of the Church says, that they [homosexuals] should not be discriminated against, that they should be respected, accompanied pastorally."

Pope Francis said the Church should seek forgiveness from those whom it had marginalized.The Pope and Armenian patriarch release doves in ceremony at Khor Virap monastery, Armenia, 26 June 2016Pope and Armenian patriarch Catholicos Karekin II released doves of peace near Mt Ararat

"I think that the Church not only should apologize... to a gay person whom it offended but it must also apologize to the poor as well, to the women who have been exploited, to children who have been exploited by [being forced to] work. It must apologize for having blessed so many weapons."

In 2013, Pope Francis reaffirmed the Roman Catholic Church's position that homosexual acts were sinful, but homosexual orientation was not.

"If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge?" he said then.

Pope Francis speaking to journalists about the EU: "Let's not throw the baby out with the bath water"

In other remarks on Sunday, the Pope said he hoped the European Union would be able to recover following the UK's decision to leave.

"There is something that is not working in that bulky union, but let's not throw the baby out with the bath water, let's try to jump-start things, to re-create," he said.Armenians wait to see Pope at the Khor Virap monastery, Armenia. 26 June 2016Thousand's of Armenians traveled to see the Pope during his visit

During his visit to the Armenian capital, Yerevan, the Pope described the mass killing of Armenians under Ottoman Turkish rule in World War One as "genocide".

Turkey has always disputed the numbers killed and angrily rejects the term "genocide".

In response, Turkish deputy prime minister Nurettin Canikli said the Pope's comments were "very unfortunate" adding it was "possible to see all the reflections and traces of crusader mentality in the actions of the papacy".

The Pope's spokesman, Father Federico Lombardi, later told reporters: "The Pope is on no crusade. He is not trying to organize wars or build walls but he wants to build bridges. He has not said a word against the Turkish people."

After Orlando Massacre, Gun Sale Background Checks Spike in June

0

It has become a familiar pattern in the United States: After a mass shooting, Americans try to stock up on guns.

Background checks for firearm sales spiked in June, the same month a shooter killed 49 people at an Orlando gay nightclub, according to data released by the FBI late last week. This spike in background checks outpaced all previous years by a substantial margin, as seen in the chart below, which compares background checks in June against the previous 10 years

This is not a one-time phenomenon. After past mass shootings, similar spikes have been observed. Though background checks are not exactly the same as gun sales, past analyses have found they are a close proxy for sales.

In particular, after the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting and after the San Bernardino and Colorado Springs shootings — which all occurred just before the holidays — gun background checks for sales increased at rates seen at no other comparable points in the history of the data that the FBI collects and releases to the public about firearm background checks. A disproportionately large number of those checks were for long guns, like those used in recent mass shootings. The year after Sandy Hook went on to beat gun sales records by double-digit margins.

While background checks have spiked after mass shootings, the number of U.S. households with at least one gun has been steadily declining. Gun sales more than doubled between 2002 and 2013, even as household ownership flat-lined.

The following chart, which surveys adults through 2014, shows the decades-long decline in gun ownership, which a survey suggested at the time could be linked to a decline in hunting.

Source link

Chipotle executive turns himself in to face drug charges

0

This Monday, Feb. 8, 2016, photo shows the sign over a Chipotle Mexican Grill in Brandon, Fla. The Chipotle marketing executive leading the chain’s efforts to rebound after an E. coli outbreak was arrested Tuesday, July 5, 2016, on multiple counts of cocaine possession. (Chris O’Meara/Associated Press)

NEW YORK — The Chipotle executive leading the chain’s efforts to rebound after an E. coli outbreak that has sent sales plunging turned himself in Tuesday to face cocaine-possession charges, his lawyer said.

Mark Crumpacker, one of the Mexican food chain’s top executives, heads marketing as its chief creative and development officer. Since the outbreak last year, Chipotle has been trying incentives, coupons and other plans to win customers back.

New York Police Department Sgt. Lee Jones said Crumpacker, 53, was arrested at 9 a.m. Tuesday on seven counts of possession of a controlled substance. Crumpacker’s attorney, Gerald Lefcourt, said Crumpacker was not in New York over the weekend and turned himself in on Tuesday morning.

He was released on $4,500 cash bail and his next court date is Sept. 8, Lefcourt said. Crumpacker did not respond to a message left on his cellphone.

Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. said late Thursday it placed Crumpacker on leave following a New York Daily News report that he was among 18 customers of a cocaine ring named in an indictment by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.

According to the indictment, Crumpacker bought cocaine on multiple dates between Jan. 29 and May 14. During that time, Chipotle was trying to manage the fallout from the E. coli outbreak that had come to light this past fall, as well as other subsequent food scares.

One of the alleged cocaine purchases came on the same day Chipotle temporarily closed a store in Massachusetts amid concerns that some employees had norovirus.

Crumpacker was given a pay package worth $4.3 million last year, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Chipotle saw sales at established locations drop 30 percent in the first quarter of the year. The efforts to rebound have included coupons for free burritos, a summertime loyalty program, and plans to introduce chorizo as a topping in restaurants nationally.

The company said Crumpacker’s responsibilities have been assigned to other senior managers.

“We made this decision in order to remain focused on the operation of our business, and to allow Mark to focus on these personal matters,” Chipotle said in its statement.

___

Source link

Why Two of Europe’s Biggest Banks Can’t Pass the Stress Test

0

The vast majority of big banks seem to be getting a handle on the costly, labor-intensive and time-consuming stress-testing process. Twenty-nine institutions have cleared the bar in each of the last two years.

For a pair of large banking companies, however, Santander Holdings USA and Deutsche Bank Trust Corp., the stress tests have so far proven to be an unconquerable challenge.

AB063016CCAR[1]

The Federal Reserve Board announced Wednesday that the two were alone in failing this year's Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review. The results marked the second consecutive failed stress test for the unit of Germany-based Deutsche Bank, and the third straight year that Santander's U.S. arm has flunked.

Both companies met the minimum regulatory capital ratios that are required by the Fed, but they fell short on qualitative grounds, just as they did in 2015. The Deutsche and Santander units were both called out for what the Fed identified as deficiencies in risk-management processes and stress-testing processes, though the Fed also said that both firms have made progress.

Both of the struggling banks are foreign-owned, but observers were split on whether that factor is contributing to their poor results.

Oliver Ireland, a partner at Morrison & Foerster, said that they may be the result of different priorities at the parent company level.

"The U.S. regulators may have the full attention of the U.S. management, but they may not have the same attention of the foreign management," he said.

But Will Newcomer, a vice president at Wolters Kluwer, expressed doubt that European ownership is a factor. "I can't imagine a foreign parent being less interested," he said.

Deutsche and Santander were quick to note that the Fed determined that they have adequate levels of capital. But they also acknowledged that they have work left to do.

"We appreciate the Federal Reserve's recognition of our progress," said Bill Woodley, deputy chief executive of Deutsche Bank Americas, in a press release, "and we will implement the lessons learned this year in order to strengthen our capital planning process for future CCAR submissions."

Scott Powell, CEO of Santander Holdings USA, said in a press release, "We have made progress, but our internal capital planning, stress testing, internal controls, governance and oversight require further improvement to meet our regulators' expectations."

The key question now is what will be the consequences for repeated failures. Santander Holdings USA, a unit of Banco Santander in Spain, is the first bank to fail CCAR three years in a row.

The Fed noted Wednesday that when banks fail the test, they may not make any capital distributions to their shareholders unless expressly authorized by the Fed.

In the past, the Fed has said that banks that demonstrate a chronic inability or unwillingness to correct deficient behavior can also be subject to enhanced regulatory actions, including but not limited to cease-and-desist orders.

But a senior Fed official told reporters Wednesday that the Santander and Deutsche units are committing more resources to the stress-testing process. At the same time, the official acknowledged the possibility that there could be additional consequences if the two banks continue to fail stress tests in future years.

In any event, the stress-testing struggles of Santander and Deutsche do not reflect the experiences of all foreign-owned banks.

BBVA Compass, BMO Financial, HSBC North America and MUFG Americas are among the foreign-owned banks that passed this year's stress test. So did first-time participants BankWest Corp. and TD Group US Holdings, both of which are also owned by foreign banks.

The results were also positive Wednesday for almost all of the large U.S.-based banks. The capital plans submitted by JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Citigroup and numerous regional banks did not receive an objection from the Fed.

That stamp of approval means that the companies can move forward with their plans for dividends and share repurchases.

The Fed's thumbs-up carried special significance for Ally Financial, which failed the stress tests in 2012 and 2013, and has yet to pay a dividend since going public in 2014. Detroit-based Ally recently emerged from a fight with activist investors who wanted more capital to be sent to shareholders.

Under Ally's capital plan, the firm plans to start paying a quarterly dividend in August, and to repurchase up to $700 million in stock over the next year.

"The inaugural dividend since becoming publicly traded is a critical step in returning capital to Ally shareholders," CEO Jeffrey Brown said in a press release.

Two U.S.-based banks did encounter problems, but both of them still passed the stress tests.

The Fed lodged what it calls a conditional non-objection with respect to Morgan Stanley's capital plan. The investment banking firm is being required to address certain weaknesses and resubmit its capital plan by Dec. 29.

M&T Bank initially fell short of the Fed's minimum required regulatory capital ratios, but the Buffalo, N.Y., company submitted an adjusted capital plan that enabled it to pass.

Overall, the results suggested that seven years after the stress tests were established, they are becoming a more routine exercise for most large banks.

"Over the six years in which CCAR has been in place, the participating firms have strengthened their capital positions and improved their risk-management capacities," Fed Gov. Daniel Tarullo said in a press release.

Starting next year, most regional banks with assets of $50 billion to $250 billion are expected to be exempted from the qualitative portion of the stress tests. The senior Fed official said Wednesday that those firms have made substantial progress in improving their capital planning.

In part one of the stress tests, which was released last week, the Fed concluded that the nation's 33 biggest bank holding companies have added more than $700 billion in common equity capital since 2009.

Part two took into account each bank's specific plan for returning capital to shareholders, rather than relying on a standard formula, as the first part did.

In between last week's results and those released on Wednesday, U.S. banks got a real-life stress test, when global financial markets were rattled by the decision of U.K. voters to leave the European Union. The Brexit outcome was not a specific part of the severely adverse scenario that the Fed established for this year's test, but the scenario did foresee serious recessions in the U.K., the eurozone and the United States.

s2Member®