Saturday, October 24, 2026
Home Blog Page 90

Amid shifting politics, wind power capacity whooshes higher

0

Sleek white wind turbines, 25 stories tall, rise from the plains of West Texas in Big Spring. Texas is one of the windiest states in the nation and the Panhandle and West Texas are the state's windiest regions. Photo: CAROLYN MARY BAUMAN, STF / KRTWASHINGTON - Wind turbine construction in the United States has rebounded to its highest level in three years, in the aftermath of a long political fight over the future of federal tax credits that support renewable energy projects.

More than 8,500 megawatts of wind power capacity was built last year, almost double the 2014 tally, according to a report Tuesday by the American Wind Energy Association. More than 3,600 megawatts of that construction - enough to power about 100,000 homes - was built in Texas, which now counts almost a quarter of the country's wind energy. The surge followed a rush by wind developers to get projects under construction before the end of 2014 out of fear Congress would not renew the tax credit, an uncertainty that has hung over the industry almost since its inception two decades ago.

But industry officials are optimistic that less volatile times are ahead after Congress recently approved a bipartisan deal extending the tax credit through 2019 and government regulation on carbon emissions produced by their fossil fuel competitors is increasing.

"The wind industry has been on a boom-bust cycle going back 20 years," said Jacob Susman, head of sales and marketing at EDF Renewable Energy, which operates wind farms across Texas. "If you look at the Paris agreement and the Clean Power Plan, that gives you a 15-year, maybe 50-year, framework on how we want to see our older, dirtier power facilities replaced with cleaner, modern facilities."
Business

Saudi Arabian Oil Minister Ali Al-Naimi speaks this year in Houston. Saudi Arabia and Russia reportedly are working on an agreement to cut oil production.
Stocks rise broadly, led by gains in the energy sector
Sleek white wind turbines, 25 stories tall, rise from the plains of West Texas in Big Spring. Texas is one of the windiest states in the nation and the Panhandle and West Texas are the state's windiest regions.
Amid shifting politics, wind power capacity whooshes higher
Gasoline may be down over 20 percent from 2015.
Summer gasoline prices to be at their lowest in a dozen years
FILE - In this Tuesday, May 19, 2015, file photo, Valeant Pharmaceuticals CEO J. Michael Pearson poses at the company's annual general meeting in Montreal. Valeant Pharmaceuticals asked its CEO to cooperate with a Senate investigation into drug pricing after he failed to appear for a deposition. The Senate Special Committee on Aging said on April 6, 2016, that it planned to start legal proceedings against Pearson, who is leaving Valeant after months of turmoil for the drugmaker. Pearson is still under subpoena to appear before the committee for an April 27 hearing. (Ryan Remiorz/The Canadian Press via AP, File) MANDATORY CREDIT
In brief: Debt deal gives Chesapeake shares a big lift
Halliburton CEO David Lesar, third from right, rings the New York Stock Exchange opening bell on Nov. 18, 2014. The previous day, Halliburton and Baker Hughes announced their plan to combine, shortly after oil prices began to fall.
With $3.5B fee, a Halliburton-Baker Hughes breakup would be
Exelon's Colorado Bend Generating Station in Wharton is being expanded with a natural gas unit. Natural gas prices are low.
Depressed Texas power prices mean cheap electricity, plant

Last year the Obama administration announced a Clean Power Plan, seeking to cut carbon emission from the power sector more than 30 percent from 2005 levels. Then in December, nearly 200 countries agreed during a meeting in Paris to cut greenhouse gas emissions to prevent the Earth's temperature from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius.

The question now is whether the rapid growth in wind power can be sustained after a sixfold increase in production capacity over the past decade.

Between the tax credit and a sharp decline in turbine costs, running wind turbines became so much more profitable in Texas that there were times in recent years where wind developers would pay utilities to buy their electricity so they could collect the tax credit, which is only paid on power that is delivered

Along the way, new markets have been created. Investment firms have been putting capital into wind farms as a means to protect their investments in traditional natural gas plants against spikes in fuel prices, said Michael Goggin, senior director of research at the American Wind Energy Association.

Also, corporations eager to meet internal environmental goals and get a guaranteed price on their electricity for years to come have been signing on to long-term power deals with wind producers

Google, Procter & Gamble, General Motors, and Mars, the maker of M&M's and other candies, are among dozens of major U.S. corporations buying electricity directly from wind farms in Texas, said Jeffrey Clark, director of the Wind Coalition, an industry group.

"I love to tell people every M&M is made with wind," he said.

For now, analysts are predicting that the rapid pace of construction last year will continue. More than 14,000 megawatts of wind turbines, enough to power about 380,000 homes, are under construction or in the late stages of development, Goggin said.

Under a bipartisan federal budget deal last year that also ended a decades-long ban on U.S. oil exports, the renewable energy tax credit was extended through 2019 - though with shrinking payments to developers beginning next year. In 2017 they will receive 80 percent of the tax credit, down to 60 percent in 2018 and 40 percent in 2019.

The hope among developers is that as the tax credit starts to shrink, President Barack Obama's rule cutting carbon emissions from the power plants fired by natural gas and coal will increase demand for wind power as older coal-fired plants are put out of business.

That rule was stayed by the U.S. Supreme Court in February, pending a ruling on its legality by the justices.

Max Levchin’s Affirm raises $100 million to expand beyond point-of-sale financing

0

Max Levchin

Affirm has raised $100 million in equity funding that the financial technology company will use to develop what it calls “direct-to-consumer” products. The round was led by Founders Fund and includes participation from Lightspeed Venture Partners, Spark Capital, Khosla Ventures, Andreessen Horowitz, Jefferies, and others. The company declined to provide its valuation.

It’s worth noting that this is an equity round, which is contrary to the previous round which included some debt. The company told VentureBeat that it has plans to evolve its offerings, such as new ways to get funds right from the palm of your hands via a mobile app instead of point of sale, and also three new partnerships that it plans to announce next month.

Investments will also be made in building up the number of merchants that currently support Affirm, as well as increasing the company’s capacity to distribute loans.

Founded by PayPal cofounder Max Levchin, Affirm seeks to uproot the financial lending industry. It currently operates at point of sale systems in more than 700 merchant locations around the U.S., underwriting loans in real-time to people using just data like their first and last name, date of birth, and the last four digits of their social security number. It’s available as a payment method, online, and in stores, using technology and analytics as a means of evaluating someone beyond just looking at their FICO score.

The service bills itself as being more transparent that the bank you go to, telling you exactly how much you owe, when it’s due, and more — it’s all in the interest of the user. Affirm doesn’t charge any compounded interest or late fees. It makes its money with simple interest. Recipients make simple payments to settle their accounts.

“I’m building what I hope will be the next generation consumer bank,” Levchin said in an interview. He stated that his company’s vision has been to build “an aspirational truly loved financial institution for everyone. Most large financial institutions don’t enjoy much love or admiration by their own customers, they’ve settled on ways to make money that’s not aligned with their customers.”

After four years, Levchin seems content with where Affirm is at right now in terms of progress. He’s also not thinking about taking the company public. When asked about whether he fears incumbent competing with him, he quipped that it wasn’t possible due to the financial implications and other corporate issues that would be at play, but would be happy if it did: “If Affirm causes the industry to change and stop overcharging and making money on late fees, I would welcome that.”

Right now Affirm is servicing those in the U.S., but there are aspirations to expand internationally. However, Levchin says that there’s “plenty to do” still in the country.

To date, the company has raised approximately $425 million in debt and equity funding.

Affirm is using data to solve hard problems in finance. We make instant lending decisions that make online buying experiences awesome and drive incremental purchases for merchants. Our team brings together a broad experience in payment... read more »

New! Track Affirm's Landscape to stay on top of the industry in 3 minutes a day. Understand the entire ecosystem, monitor innovation, and track deal flows. Learn more.

Source link

Colorado wind power rising; 1880 turbines and Xcel, Vestas plan more

0

Colorado set national records with 54 percent of Xcel's electricity over two 24-hour periods generated by wind

BRIGHTON — Colorado wind power is rising with 1,880 huge turbines erected across the prairie, twisting white blades as long as soccer fields, a cleaner source of energy replacing fossil fuels.

It has reached the point where the wind turbines generated 67 percent of Xcel Energy's Colorado-made electricity for one early morning hour in November, and 54 percent for two 24-hour periods in October
— feats unmatched around the nation, industry officials said Tuesday.

Falling costs, a state mandate, a federal subsidy and sheer momentum are driving the shift to renewable energy.

The proliferation of turbines here — doubling the number in 2009 — reflects a takeoff of wind power nationally that has cut carbon dioxide emissions by 132 million tons, American Wind Energy Association research director Michael Groggin said.

Giant Vestas wind turbine blades loaded on a train awaiting delivery at the plant April 12, 2016. Giant Vestas wind turbine blades loaded on a train awaiting delivery at the plant April 12, 2016. (Andy Cross, The Denver Post)

"That's the equivalent of taking 28 million cars off the road, and this is going to help Colorado comply with the Clean Power Plan," Groggin said.

Shifting from coal and gas to wind power "will help bring the United States into compliance with international climate change commitments. It will show that the U.S. can be a leader," he said.

Politicians and investors are embracing the shift. Long a backer of oil and gas extraction along the Front Range, Gov. John Hickenlooper on Tuesday opened a national industry forum at a Vestas Americas turbine factory
in Brighton — one of four Vestas plants in the state that employ 3,700 workers.

"This is a state issue for us. We view it as one of our highest priorities," Hickenlooper said.

Colorado initially looked to natural gas as bridge away from coal-fired electricity, but "wind is going to take an increasingly large share of that as well," he said.

Today, "wind turbine technician" ranks as the fastest-growing occupation, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Utility giant Xcel Energy is playing a key role, purchasing electricity from 21 Colorado wind farms.

"We've cultivated wind as our most cost-effective renewable energy option because we recognize that this source of energy is not only a benefit to the environment but also a major economic driver for the state," Xcel's Colorado operations president David Eves said. "Our plan is to expand our wind offerings to provide hundreds of new jobs for Coloradans, make a billion dollars in new investments, keep energy costs low for our customers, and improve the environment."

On Tuesday, Eves and Vestas Americas chief Chris Brown announced a plan to build Colorado's largest wind farm. If the Public Utilities Commission approves, the eastern plains project would add 300 more wind turbines and produce 600 megawatts of electricity.

Congress has extended the federal government subsidy for the wind power industry until the end of this year, boosting incentives to build before a gradual phase-out.

Xcel supplies 65 percent of Colorado residents and currently generates 2,566 megawatts of electricity from wind, or about 25 percent of demand. In comparison, more than half Xcel's electricity comes from coal and 1 to 2 percent comes from solar sources.

Colorado lawmakers in 2004 initiated change, passing a renewable energy standard requiring public utilities to use wind and solar to produce some of their electricity. Lawmakers twice have increased that percentage. By 2020, 30 percent of electricity must come from renewable sources.

Xcel already averages in "the high 20s," a spokesman said. The surges where 67 percent and 54 percent of electricity came from wind occurred on windy days when overall electricity use by residents was relatively low.

Overall, Colorado utilities on average produce 14 percent of electricity from wind turbines, ranking the state among national leaders. Iowa leads at 31 percent.

One reason wind has advanced is forecasting. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration meteorologists analyze energy potential from wind and try to give utility grid operators several hours, and sometimes days, of notice when wind will be strong.

This allows operators to adjust the grid draw wind power, rather than from coal or other sources, when it is available.

Governor Hickenlooper hails rise of wind power at Vestas plant on April 12, 2016.Governor Hickenlooper hails rise of wind power at Vestas plant on April 12, 2016. (Bruce Finley, The Denver Post)

Industry analysts said wind's role will continue to expand.

And Vestas CEO Brown said the massive fiberglass blades made in Brighton may expand, too.

While installation of more transmission lines will be essential, shifting to clean energy in the future will hinge on "capturing more wind" with blades, he said.

Even a 1-meter lengthening of blades that now stretch 100 meters from tip-to-tip could more than double the amount electricity produced, he said.

"We want to have taller towers and bigger blades," he said

Source link

Big oil and gas stock skyrockets 61% in 2 days

0

Ex-Chesapeake Energy CEO dead after car crash

Fears of a catastrophic cash crunch at Chesapeake Energy are fading. Fast.

Chesapeake's(CHK) stock spiked 34% on Tuesday, the biggest one-day gain since the oil and natural gas company went public in 1993.

Investors and analysts are cheering Chesapeake's announcement that its banks have agreed not to yank a credit line worth $4 billion. That's huge because the oil crash has made it more difficult for Chesapeake to pay down its huge debt load of $10 billion.

Chesapeake also bought itself more time with the banks by pushing back its next review by creditors until June 2017... as long as it maintains certain financial metrics.

"This definitely extends the runway for liquidity," said David Holt, an analyst at S&P Global Market Intelligence who raised his price target on Chesapeake to $6 per share from $3.

Chesapeake is considered one of the pioneers of shale energy in the U.S. The company was founded by Aubrey McClendon, who died in a fiery car wreck earlier this year following a federal indictment on bid-rigging charges.

Chesapeake stock soaring oil gas

Related: U.S. oil bankruptcies spike 379%

Other analysts are turning more optimistic on Chesapeake as well. Tudor, Pickering, Holt removed its "sell" rating on Chesapeake on Tuesday, citing the agreement with lenders and the recent surge in oil prices above $42 a barrel.

Citigroup also upgraded Chesapeake's 2017 and 2018 junk bonds to "buy," saying the new agreement gives the company "time to ride out a low commodity price environment."

The enthusiastic reaction on Wall Street underscores how worried investors were about the ability of Chesapeake to survive the downturn. Things got so bad that in February Chesapeake had to put out a statement denying reports it was plotting a bankruptcy filing.

The bad news is that Chesapeake shares are still down nearly 60% over the past year. And the new deal with banks required Chesapeake to pony up lots more collateral to reel back its credit facility. Chesapeake said in a regulatory filing it has pledged "substantially all" of its assets, including mortgages covering 90% of its proved oil and gas properties.

Holt said those concessions mean that while the short-term liquidity worries have eased, longer-term solvency risks remain.

"We think the additional assets pledged for collateral leave little room for error," said Holt.

Source link

Ford looks to Silicon Valley in corporate campus redesign

0

Borrowing a page from the Silicon Valley playbook, Ford Motor is going on a building and renovation spree near Detroit in hopes of creating more inviting and idea-inspiring work spaces.

Ford plans to renovate or build 7.5 million square feet of office space, research facilities and engineering operations, marking the first dramatic overhaul of its home base in six decades. Much of the work will be in the company's historic base of Dearborn, Mich.

Ford CEO Mark Fields said in an interview that the goal is to develop more open workspaces to encourage conversations and collaboration between different divisions — a concept well known to the tech industry that is only recently making its way through the more traditional automotive business.

"People really like being connected and not being in, let’s say, the 1970s and '80s layout where what was more appropriate then was to work in cubicle areas and have your own little personal space," Fields said. "We’re just looking at how they’re living their lives now, staying connected, and we’re saying, ‘how do we do that?’"

The sweeping real estate play — which affects 30,000 employees currently working in 70 separate buildings — is designed to give the company a fighting chance in the war for young professionals as Silicon Valley tech giants with hip corporate campuses hire away the auto industry's most talented engineers to develop autonomous vehicles and electric cars.

It also accelerates a trend among major automakers to inject a fresh dose of innovation into their once-stodgy workplace environments, where PowerPoint presentations and top-down management once prevailed over collaborative working and free-flowing communication.

Ford's corporate-campus overhaul comes as Toyota is preparing a new North American headquarters in Plano, Texas, and as General Motors continues a $1 billion renovation of its Tech Center operation in Warren, Mich.

Ford would not reveal an investment figure but said the spending is contained within its previously disclosed capital plans. Construction will begin within weeks at the research and engineering campus, while work on the headquarters campus will start in 2021. All construction is expected to finish by 2026.

The anchor of the engineering campus will be a new 700,000-square-foot design facility, Ford said.

Steve Morris, a real estate broker and managing principal of Axis Advisors in Farmington Hills, Mich., estimated that the overall project easily represents a $1.2 billion investment.

"It’s a very strong statement about the commitment to community and future of the automobile industry in Michigan," Morris said.

Most of the square footage included in the overhaul is contained within existing buildings, said Donna Inch, CEO of Ford Motor Land Development, the automaker's real estate division. But she said the company would construct several new facilities, as well, but declined to say how many.

Many of the buildings have been only lightly upgraded since they were first built in the 1950s, Inch said.

Altogether, the plan is to locate 30,000 employees at a corporate campus and an R&D campus in Dearborn, Mich., which Henry Ford picked as the hometown for his company in the early 20th Century.

The actual headquarters building won't change much because of its iconic mid-20th Century architecture, Inch said, but it will get certain upgrades such as infrastructure improvements and new windows. Ford also plans to build a new facility for its Ford Credit operation that will be connected to the headquarters.

Fields said Ford is embracing "we space" — open, collaborative workplaces — over "me space," or cloistered offices for individuals and walls separating departments.

"It's a very big transformation," he said.

Collaborative, open work environments in which workers are not assigned a specific desk or share space with others has increased in 82% of companies with more than 5,000 employees since 2009, according to a 2015 survey by the International Facility Management Association.

"There is certainly a fairly significant shift occurring in how people use office spaces to achieve specific goals," IFMA spokesman Jed Link said in an interview. "What Silicon Valley, the Apples and the Googles are doing is making it incredibly visible. They use their workspace in part as a recruiting tool."

Asked whether Ford considered relocating employees elsewhere, Fields and Inch said the company remains committed to Dearborn as its hometown but will continue to grow operations elsewhere, including its Silicon Valley office in Palo Alto, Calif. No employees are moving out of Dearborn, they said.

The plan includes an emphasis on environmental sustainability, with an expectation that the completed campuses will use half the energy that Ford currently uses in Dearborn.

Inch said Ford would try to make every existing building qualify for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Silver certification from the U.S. Green Building Council, while new buildings would pursue LEED Gold. One facility will generate zero waste, use no fossil fuels and waste no water in a clean-tech showcase.

Like other auto companies, the company will also have autonomous cars running around its campuses. Ford picked architectural firm SmithGroupJJR to handle design. Inch declined to identify contractors.

Source link

ES Morning Update April 13th 2016

0

39b91591-8a4e-4afe-ba9c-92041b48830f

Futures hit 2069.25 as a high, or basically a double top from the 2071.50 high on April 4th.

Bears got teased yesterday with a slight pierce of the rising trendline of support but it quickly reversed and started this squeeze up.

MACD's are overbought on this 60 minute chart suggesting an early pullback but the 2 hour, 4 hour and 6 hour are still pointing up.  This suggests the small pullback will be bought.

Yesterday the charted looked pretty bearish and the daily on the SPX cash was really looking bad.  But today we see a hook back up on that daily chart (not shown here of course) with it's MACD's, and that's really what we need to see happen to create a lower high on them, with a higher high on the actually SPX price, therefore creating a negative divergence and a likely top.  When will this happen?  Hard too say but as early as this Friday is possible?  I personally think will top next week that's where my turn date is at, and several other critical clues I've discussed several times in the chatroom.

Since we are overbought on the 60 minute chart and up near a double top I think we'll see our "high of the day" around the open as it's rare to see a breakthrough on the first hit of any double top... plus we are short term overbought as well.  Therefore I think we'll see some choppy action today as we pullback a little, go back up from the late comer "buy the dippers"... but I don't think it will breakout over the prior high of 2071.50, but instead just bounce around the top area pulling back and going back up several times... but getting no where really.

If the pullback gets going there's good horizontal support in the 2050 area, but again I'm not looking for a big fast move down.  More likely is a choppy up and down action with that zone "maybe" being hit at some point, but it might take all day?  So, to keep it simple, I'm looking for the futures to bang around this double top area but not breakout today.  Pullbacks will likely be bought and probably be shallow.  But all the pullbacks that are bought are the retail sheep who are late to the party and missed the big squeeze yesterday when the support didn't breakdown.  I missed the upside target as I think I said we could see 2060 area if they failed to breakdown and we only got about 2055 by the close, but we hit it afterhours.

History Of The Current Oil Price Crash And Where To Invest

0

Summary

We are currently in an oversupplied oil market but things aren't always what they seem.

Investing in the oil market is simple if you follow a couple of key principles.

2016 is going to be a much better year than 2015, despite what you may see on television.

Why OPEC has failed to act to shore up production and fix this issue.

Introduction

If you are a new or experienced oil investor in a popular oil Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) like (NYSEARCA:USO) or (NYSEARCA:OIL), it can be difficult to understand how the price of oil reached its current level and subsequently where to invest. From time to time, an article is published that provides a history lesson for those that have just tuned into what's going on with the price of oil and oil-related investments. I thought it was about time we had another such article.

Price is truth?

Over the past year, I've been long oil via Linn Energy (NASDAQ:LINE) (NASDAQ:LNCO), BreitBurn Energy Partners (NASDAQ:BBEP), Transocean (NYSE:RIG), First Solar (NASDAQ:FSLR), Legacy Reserves (NASDAQ:LGCY), and Mid-Con Energy Partners LP (NASDAQ:MCEP).

If you look at the volatility represented in the chart below, you could be mistaken for thinking it's a chart of a hot technology stock, not the price of WTI Crude oil for the last 18 months.

To provide some perspective on exactly how big the recent moves in the price of oil have been, this next chart shows the previous 3 years, you can clearly see the difference.

For anyone following financial markets back in 2008, you'll remember crude hitting $140 a barrel. At that time many were calling for even higher prices. Goldman Sachs made their now famous $200 oil claim, and some were even calling for $300.

The chart below shows the price action from 2008 to 2011 with the red lines highlighting the peaks and troughs.

During 2008, there was a significant drop in world oil demand due to the global financial crisis. OPEC subsequently agreed to cut production by 4.2 million barrels at their meeting in December 2008 and oil producers lived happily afterward with prices trading in the $80 to $100 range until late 2014. However, during the years following 2008, U.S. consumers felt very threatened by $4 gas and what a reliance on overseas oil meant. With the U.S. Presidential election campaigns in full swing, chants of "drill, baby, drill" and "drill, drill, drill" became staples of U.S. Republican Presidential candidates. Even though U.S. President Obama didn't feel like the U.S. could fix the issue alone, he pledged to end the "tyranny of oil" in early 2009.

Source link

Worldwide Mac Sales Hold Steady as PC Market Sees Shipments Decline 9.6% in Q1 2016

0

Amid a decline in worldwide PC shipments, Apple's Mac sales have held steady, according to new PC shipping estimates from Gartner. During the first quarter of 2016, Apple shipped 4.6 million Macs worldwide and held 7.1 percent of the market, up from 4.56 million Mac shipments and 6.4 percent of the market during the first quarter of 2015.

While Apple only saw 1 percent worldwide growth, it fared better than the overall PC market, which saw total worldwide shipments of 64.8 million, a 9.6 percent decline from 71.7 million shipments in Q1 2015. Among other vendors, Lenovo and HP saw some of the biggest shipment drops with 12.5 million and 11.4 million shipments in 1Q 2016, down from 13.5 million and 12.5 million, respectively, in the year-ago quarter.

gartner_1Q16_global

Gartner's Preliminary Worldwide PC Vendor Unit Shipment Estimates for 1Q16 (Thousands of Units)
With 7.1 percent of the market, Apple ranked as the number five worldwide vendor, coming in after Lenovo (19.3% share), HP (17.6% share), Dell (14.1% share), and ASUS (8.3% share). Other vendors, not ranked in the top five, accounted for 33.6 percent of the market.

The deterioration of local currencies against the U.S. dollar continued to play a major role in PC shipment declines. Our early results also show there was an inventory buildup from holiday sales in the fourth quarter of 2015," said Mikako Kitagawa, principal analyst at Gartner.

While Apple's worldwide numbers were steady, Mac sales in the United States appear to have dipped slightly. According to Gartner's data, Apple shipped 1.666 million PCs in the United States, for 12.7 percent of the market. That's down from 1.672 million in the year-ago quarter, but market share is up from 11.8 percent.

gartner_1Q16_us

Gartner's Preliminary U.S. PC Vendor Unit Shipment Estimates for 1Q16 (Thousands of Units)
Dell, the number one vendor in the U.S., shipped 3.5 million PCs in Q1 2016 for 26.3 percent of the market, while HP shipped 3.1 million for 23.7 percent of the market. Lenovo saw the greatest growth with 1.9 million shipments and 14.5 percent of the market, while ASUS saw a decline in shipments from 770,000 in Q1 2015 to 667,000 in Q1 2016 for just 5.1 percent of the market.

In the overall U.S. PC market, shipments totaled 13.1 million in the first quarter of 2016, a decline of 6.6 percent compared to the year-ago quarter and the lowest shipment volume in the country in three years.

gartner_1Q16_us_trend

Apple's U.S. Market Share Trend: 1Q06-1Q16 (Gartner)
IDC also released its shipment estimates today, and as is typical, its numbers are different than Gartner's numbers, in part due to the difference in the way Windows-based tablets are counted by each firm. According to IDC, worldwide PC shipments totaled 60.6 million, for an overall decline of 11.5 percent.

While Gartner ranks Apple as number five vendor in worldwide PC shipments, IDC ranks Apple as number four with 4.5 million shipments and 7.4 percent of the market (a decline from 4.6 million shipments in Q1 2015), edging out ASUS's 4.4 million shipments. As for U.S. shipments, IDC puts the total number at 13.625 million, an overall decline of 5.8 percent.

IDC's U.S. shipment estimates are more favorable to Apple, suggesting PC shipments totaling 1.8 million and 13 percent market share for growth of 5.6 percent rather than the slight decline Gartner estimates. Like Gartner, IDC lists Dell (3.5m shipments), HP (3.5m shipments), Lenovo (1.9m shipments), and Apple (1.8m shipments) as the top four PC vendors in the United States, but IDC positions Acer Group (711,000 shipments) as the number five vendor while Gartner lists it as ASUS.

It's important to note that data from Gartner and IDC is preliminary and that the numbers can shift, sometimes dramatically, while other times, the estimates are closer to the actual data. Last year, for example, Gartner estimated Apple's Q1 2015 U.S. PC shipments to be 1.670 million, fairly close to the correct 1.672 million shipment number.
Source link

First price decrease for stamps in nearly a century

0

NATIONAL -- Sending mail just cheaper. As of Sunday, the price of stamps is two cents lower. But it's not good news for the postal service.

It's going to cost them about $2 billion. The postal service says they didn't really have a choice. They've been relying on a surcharge to boost revenue since the recession last decade. The Postal Regulatory Commission says they've gotten enough relief and it's time to get rid of it.

 

On Sunday, sending a 1 ounce letter went from 49 cents to 47 cents. Any additional ounce will now be 21 cents instead of 22 cents. These are just a couple examples of the cuts.

Postal workers say it it's not a decision they agree with but they'll have to work with it. The postal service doesn't get any tax revenue from it's services. They rely totally on sales to stay afloat.

The last time the price of stamps was lowered was 1919, making this the third time in the country's history that's happened.

Source link

China report sounds alarm on groundwater pollution

0

China report sounds alarm on groundwater pollutionIn this April 6, 2016 photo, a farmer sets up water pipes for trickle irrigation at a cherry garden in Yantai in east China's Shandong province. A government report says more than 80 percent of underground water drawn from relatively shallow wells used by farms, factories and mostly rural households is unsafe for drinking because of pollution from heavy metals and agricultural chemicals.

The Water Resources Ministry study analyzed samples drawn in January from 2,103 wells used for monitoring in the country's major watersheds in its eastern flatlands. (Chinatopix via AP)

More than 80 percent of China's underground water drawn from relatively shallow wells used by farms, factories and mostly rural households is unsafe for drinking because of pollution, a government report says.

The Water Resources Ministry study posted to its website Tuesday analyzed samples drawn in January from 2,103 wells used for monitoring in the country's major eastern flatland watersheds.

The ministry said that of those samples, 32.9 percent were classed as suitable only for industrial and agricultural use, while 47.3 percent were unfit for human consumption of any type. None were considered pristine, although water in wells in the Beijing area was rated better overall than elsewhere in the northeast.

Following the report's release on Monday, officials sought to reassure the public that most household water used by urban Chinese households is safe because it comes from reservoirs, deep aquifers or rivers that are treated to ensure safety.

"The quality of drinking water is good overall," Chen Mingzhong, director of the ministry's Department of Water Resources, told reporters at a news conference.

Most public attention in recent years has focused on heavy air pollution in Chinese cities, although water and soil contamination are also regarded as serious by environmentalists.

Water shortages are also expected to pose an increasing challenge to agriculture, with much of the arid North China Plain reliant on aquifers whose levels are falling fast. China's major lakes are also heavily polluted, largely due to fertilizer run-off and the dumping of untreated factory waste.

Environmental group Greenpeace called the ministry's report "another stark warning of the extent of groundwater pollution in China."

In a statement, Greenpeace's east Asia toxics campaign manager Ada Kong applauded the ministry's recognition of the problem and said taking serious action to tackle the problem was the next step.

"Water pollution in China is every bit as serious an issue as air pollution," Kong said.

Part of the problem is that the Water Resources Ministry and Ministry of Environmental Protection have yet to clarify their roles and responsibilities in carrying out a National Groundwater Pollution Prevention Plan issued in 2011 and promised 34 billion yuan ($5.2 billion) in funding, Kong said.

The authorities should also regularly test the deep groundwater that urban areas rely on, Greenpeace said.
Source link

Alibaba pours a total of $1B into Southeast Asia e-commerce platform Lazada

0

Alibaba just took a big step in its Southeast Asian expansion journey. The company said today that it has pumped a total investment of about $1 billion into Lazada, in a deal that makes it the e-commerce platform’s controlling shareholder.

This includes $500 million in newly-issued equity capital, as well as the purchase of existing shares from Lazada shareholders. Lazada is now valued at $1.5 billion, according to Rocket Internet, which founded the company in 2011.

In separate announcements made at the same time, Rocket Internet, Tesco, and Kinnevik each said that they had sold some of their Lazada shares to Alibaba as part of the transaction. Rocket Internet offloaded a 9.1 percent stake for $137 million. Tesco, meanwhile, sold an 8.6 percent stake for $129 million, and Kinnevik parted with a 3.8 percent stake for $57 million.

This means each company now owns about half as many Lazada shares as it used to. Rocket Internet said its remaining stake is 8.8 percent, while Tesco still holds 8.3 percent and Kinnevik 3.6 percent.

Rocket Internet created Lazada to build an e-commerce business model that would span major Southeast Asian markets, including Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. China and India tend to get most of the attention, but Southeast Asia is also one of the most promising e-commerce markets in the world.

Lazada has seen strong sales growth there, but it has also experienced high net operating losses as it tries to achieve profitability.

In Indonesia, Lazada is up against rival marketplaces Tokopedia (which is backed by SoftBank and Sequoia) and MatahariMall. Alibaba’s backing not only gives it a bigger war chest, but may also allow Lazada to take advantage of the Chinese e-commerce giant’s other investments in Southeast Asia, including logistics network SingPost.

Southeast Asia and India are Alibaba’s most important international markets as it expands beyond China, but its investments in Southeast Asian companies may take priority (at least for the short term) if the Indian economy continues to slow.

In a press statement, Alibaba president Michael Evans said, “With the investment in Lazada, Alibaba gains access to a platform with a large and growing consumer base outside China, a proven management team and a solid foundation for future growth in one of the most promising regions for e-commerce globally.”

Source link

Kerry to Promote Benefits of Landmark Trade Pacts

0
Secretary of State John Kerry will promote the benefits of two trade pacts championed by the Obama administration during a Tuesday speech to government, civic and policy leaders in Los Angeles.
The State Department says Kerry will address national security opportunities of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a landmark free trade deal among 12 Pacific Rim countries, and the Trade and Investment Partnership (T-TIP), an agreement being negotiated between the U.S. and European Union.
“The Trans-Pacific Partnership is about a lot more than just creating economic opportunities,” said Kerry during an August speech in Singapore. “It is about raising standards,” he added.The U.S. and 11 other countries that make up the TPP are responsible for 40 percent of the world’s economy. Ministers from those countries signed the agreement in February but it still needs U.S. congressional approval.

FILE - A protester shouts slogans during a rally against the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) in Tokyo, Tuesday, April 22, 2014.

FILE - A protester shouts slogans during a rally against the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) in Tokyo, Tuesday, April 22, 2014.

Some U.S. Congress members have voiced concern that the TPP would hurt U.S. trade and investment.  In a March letter to President Barack Obama, a bipartisan group of New York lawmakers said they were “skeptical” that the TPP would “fare better than previous trade agreements.”

They cited provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and said those had resulted in the loss of thousands of jobs in their state.

In a statement, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative said T-TIP would “help unlock opportunity” for U.S. workers through increased access to European markets. It is unclear if the deal will be completed before President Obama leaves office.

Kerry’s California appearance will wrap up a week-long tour that included stops in Bahrain, Iraq and Afghanistan. He traveled to California from Japan, where he took part in a Group of Seven industrialized nations meeting and visited a World War II memorial site in Hiroshima.

Source link

World Bank: East Asian growth to remain over 6 pct in 2016

0

A worker takes his break on a bulldozer parked near a construction site at the Central Business District of Beijing, Monday, April 11, 2016. China will remain the main driver of growth in Asia this year despite its prolonged slowdown, helped by sustained expansions in other developing countries in the region, the World Bank said Monday. (AP Photo/Andy Wong)A worker takes his break on a bulldozer parked near a construction site at the Central Business District of Beijing, Monday, April 11, 2016. China will remain the main driver of growth in Asia this year despite its prolonged slowdown, helped by sustained expansions in other developing countries in the region, the World Bank said Monday. (AP Photo/Andy Wong)MANILA, Philippines (AP) — Growth in developing East Asia and the Pacific is expected to remain resilient despite the slowdown in China and a gloomy global outlook, the World Bank said Monday.

The U.S.-led development bank forecasts that developing East Asia will expand at a still robust pace of 6.3 percent this year and 6.2 percent in 2017-2018, down from 6.5 percent in 2015 and slightly lower than its forecast in October. The Philippines and Vietnam will lead growth in Southeast Asia.

Indonesia, the biggest economy in Southeast Asia, is forecast to grow by 5.1 percent in 2016, 5.3 percent in 2017, and 5.5 percent in 2018. But that will depend on the success of recent reforms and follow-through on ambitious public investment plans.

China, the world's second-biggest economy, is shifting from export and investment-led growth to a greater reliance on consumer spending. The World Bank's latest estimate puts growth at 6.7 percent this year, 6.5 percent in 2017, and 6.2 percent in 2018, down from 6.9 percent in 2015.

"The resilience of growth of the economies in this region is particularly striking when you realize that this has been achieved against the backdrop of fairly gloomy global growth," said Sudhir Shetty, the bank's chief economist for East Asia and the Pacific region.

But he cautioned that "it's a very volatile time for the global economy."

In 2015, developing East Asia and the Pacific accounted for almost two-fifths of global growth, more than twice the combined contribution of all other developing regions, said Victoria Kwakwa, incoming World Bank East Asia and Pacific Regional Vice President. The 14-country region includes China but excludes India, Japan, South Korea and Singapore.

"The region has benefited from careful macroeconomic policies, including efforts to boost revenue in commodity-exporting countries," she said. "But sustaining growth amid challenging global conditions will require continued progress on structural reforms."

The report called for close monitoring of economic risks, particularly those associated with high levels of debt, price deflation, slower growth in China, and high corporate and household debt in some large economies.

China reported Monday that its inflation remained steady at 2.3 percent in March, while wholesale prices paid by manufacturers, the producer price index, dropped 4.3 percent. To counter that deflationary trend, authorities plan to eliminate much of the country's excess factory capacity, especially in the steel sector.

The World Bank report urged China to continue reforms of its restrictive household-registration system, and to shift public spending from infrastructure toward public services including education, health, social assistance and environmental protection.

Elsewhere in developing Asia, the World Bank said the Philippine economy was expected to expand 6.4 percent in 2016, up from 5.8 percent last year. Vietnam is seen growing 6.5 percent this year, down from 6.7 percent last year.

The Southeast Asian economies most likely to be adversely affected by China's tapering growth include Indonesia, Mongolia, Malaysia, Vietnam, Laos and Myanmar.

Cambodia's growth is forecast at slightly below 7 percent in 2016-2018 due to weaker prices for agricultural commodities, constrained garment exports, and moderating growth in tourism.

"Countries should adopt monetary and fiscal policies that reduce their exposure to global and regional risks, and continue with structural reforms to boost productivity and promote inclusive growth," said Shetty.
Source link

European Union Calls for Big Companies to Disclose More Tax Data

0

Packages at an Amazon warehouse in Brieselang, Germany. Amazon is among several multinational companies that have been the targets of European tax inquiries.

BRUSSELS — European Union authorities called on Tuesday for 6,000 of the world’s largest companies to reveal the tax they pay to each of the bloc’s 28 member countries and to disclose their tax affairs in offshore havens.

The proposal, by the European Commission, the European Union’s executive body, was planned before the recent huge leak of documents from a Panamanian law firm, Mossack Fonseca. But if the European push becomes law, it could help to address the types of tax shelters exposed in the so-called Panama Papers.

The leaked files exposed how some of the world’s richest or most powerful people may have used offshore bank accounts and shell companies to conceal their wealth or avoid taxes.

The European proposal, while in some ways addressing offshore holdings, is primarily aimed at stopping multinational companies from shifting their profits around Europe to lower their tax bills. The biggest impact could be on the way companies that have easily recognized brands, and that are concerned about their public images, manage their taxes in the European Union.

Multinational companies including Amazon, Anheuser-Busch InBev, Apple, Google and Starbucks have been part of investigations by the European Commission into the way countries set taxes.

To become law, the proposal must receive the approval of a majority of European Union governments. The rules would apply only to multinational companies with global revenues greater than 750 million euros a year, or about $855 million.

Rather than establishing a central registry, the proposal would leave it to the bloc’s member states to enforce rules requiring companies to publish tax information on their corporate websites.

While companies with operations in some tax havens would need to give the same level of detail required for their European operations, critics said the proposed rules would still leave major gaps.

Even so, the commission said the information — including the amount of tax companies pay to each country and overseas — would be sufficient to shame companies that shift their profits mainly for tax purposes and would force them to consider changing their business practices.

“This is a carefully thought through but ambitious proposal for more transparency on tax,” said Jonathan Hill, the European commissioner for financial services.

The initiative was “not, of course, focused principally on the response to the Panama Papers,” he added, but “there is an important connection between our continuing work on tax transparency and tax havens that we are building into the proposal.”

Mr. Hill is an ally of Prime Minister David Cameron of Britain, who has been embroiled in political uproar because of money he made through an offshore trust established by his father. That trust was identified in the Panama Papers.

The European Union accelerated its efforts to curb tax avoidance in the wake of the financial crisis, which forced many governments to adopt austerity budgets, reduce public services and raise nominal tax rates.

Critics contend that because tax engineering by big corporations enabled some multinationals to skirt the higher taxes, small businesses and individual citizens bore the brunt of the impact. Politicians and policy makers attuned to that criticism have called for banks and big corporations to pay more tax and to be less secretive about where their money goes.

Margrethe Vestager, the European Union’s competition commissioner, has already ordered the Netherlands to recover back taxes from Starbucks and has told Belgium to do the same in the case of Anheuser-Busch InBev and a number of other companies.

Ms. Vestager could still do the same in a pending case against Apple, which has a similar arrangement with Ireland, and in an inquiry into Amazon, which has a tax arrangement in Luxembourg.

Tuesday’s proposal aims to lift the veil of disclosure rules, which critics say make it too complicated or too expensive for the public to understand how much tax companies pay and where they pay it.

With the changes, companies would need to make the following information available on their websites, broken down by country: the number of employees; net revenue, including money exchanged between third parties and between business units of a group; profit before tax; income tax due and paid each year.

High levels of accumulated earnings, such as profits that are not distributed but are held in certain countries, could be an indicator of attempts to avoid taxes.

The European Commission chose not to make even more information publicly available after business groups warned against putting companies with European operations at a competitive disadvantage to other parts of the world. But for some advocates of tax reform the rules do not go far enough, because companies would mostly be allowed to publish aggregated data about their payments outside the European Union.

“We still won’t know anything about the activities, tax payments and potential tax agreements by multinationals across most of the world,” said Elena Gaita, a policy officer in Brussels for Transparency International, which monitors corruption. “Another problem is that this environment is highly competitive,’’ she said, “so one country may not be a tax haven today but might become one tomorrow.”

The commission said its proposal should be sufficient to allow ordinary citizens to judge whether the tax a company pays in the European Union corresponds to the amount of business it does there.

Source link

Starbucks rolls out a more personalized mobile app along with a revamped Rewards program

0

Starbucks this morning announced the overall of its mobile application, now used by 17 million people, in an effort to create a more personalized experience for its customers. The changes rolled out alongside an overhaul of the company’s popular customer loyalty program, Starbucks Rewards, which is now doling out stars based on dollars spent in stores, rather than how often customers make purchases.

The changes to the rewards program are already receiving some backlash from consumers who are complaining about how much harder it is to now earn free rewards. Customers now earn two stars for every dollar spent, instead of one star per visit. That means they have to earn 125 stars (~$63) to reach a free reward, when before it just took 12.

Starbucks_Rewards_2016_-_Benefits_

It also will require more spending to level up in between the different reward program tiers, which have been reduced from three to two: Green and Gold. Now, customers will need to earn 300 stars to move from Green to Gold, for example.

Other tweaks include the addition of double-star days (4 stars per $1 spent), and a series of strategic partnerships with technology companies including Spotify and Lyft, which will allow customers to earn stars outside of Starbucks. JPMorgan Chase, which powers the Starbucks Rewards prepaid card, will also be involved.

This is a significant overhaul to Starbucks’ loyalty program, which is seen as one of the industry’s best in terms of traction, growth, and its embrace of technology innovations. Starbucks popularized using barcode scanners in its stores to track its customers’ visits and purchases first with plastic cards, and then with smartphones. Its mobile payments platform was adopted well before mainstream advances in mobile payments, like Apple Pay or Square.

Starbucks_Rewards_GIF_2016

Now the company is pushing forward with a Mobile Order & Pay solution that lets customers skip the line by ordering ahead. And it’s experimenting with a delivery service in partnership with Postmates.

The Starbucks mobile app, and the company’s focus on making technology a priority, has had a lot to do with the success of its loyalty program as a whole, as well as the company’s bottom line. The company said this fall that mobile payments accounted for 20 percent of all in-store transactions across the U.S., and Starbucks processes nearly nine million mobile transactions each week.

However, the Starbucks’ app’s focus, to date, has been largely on helping customers find stores, manage their cards, order and pay. That’s now changing.

While one of the notable upgrades is the integration of Mobile Order & Pay with Starbucks Rewards (before, members couldn’t redeem rewards when placing mobile orders), the more noticeable change is to the app’s homepage.

Starbucks_Rewards_2016_-_Dashboard

Following the update, customers will now see an interactive stars display which responds to users’ touches, along with other changes designed to make it easier to track stars and reward levels. Another section shows what’s “Now Playing” in the local store the customer is visiting. As you may recall, Starbucks was already working with Spotify to enhance the app experience when it comes to music – in January, it began allowing customers to save songs heard in-store to the popular music streaming service.

Music will now be better highlighted in the new app, along with guest DJ playlists, says Starbucks.

The app will also began to feature personalized offers based on order history and other factors, and it will introduce more personalized content and features from its strategic partners in the near future, the company says. In addition, Starbucks will allow customers to earn stars outside of Starbucks stores.

These changes speak to Starbucks becoming a larger player in the mobile loyalty and commerce ecosystem as a whole.

Starbucks says the changes may create slower app functionality or stars credited over the next 48 hours as the updated experience rolls out, but it doesn’t believe the majority of customers will be negatively affected by the upgrade.

Source link

Verizon strike could idle 40000 workers starting Wednesday

0

 

Verizon facing strike

Some 40,000 Verizon workers may begin striking Wednesday as they push the telecommunications giant for a new contract limiting outsourcing while increasing pay and improving working conditions.

The strike deadline is 6 a.m. Wednesday, the Communication Workers of America union said Monday.

Verizon (VZ) is the local phone company and broadband internet service provider for millions of East Coast residents, and also provides cell phone service through Verizon Wireless. Its shares closed down 1.1% at $51.61.

“We’re standing up for working families and standing up to Verizon’s corporate greed,” CWA District 1 Vice President Dennis Trainor said in a statement. “If a hugely profitable corporation like Verizon can destroy the good family-supporting jobs of highly skilled workers, then no worker in America will be safe from this corporate race to the bottom.”

Verizon officials said they need more flexibility in managing their business, especially as the landline side of the company declines. They said they’ve trained non-union workers to perform work ranging from line repairs to answering phone calls, and are ready if the union strikes.

"Legacy constraints that may have made sense in the Ma Bell era of phone booths and Princess phones don’t make sense in today’s digital world with high-speed connectivity and dynamic customer demands,” Marc Reed, Verizon’s chief administrative officer, said in a statement. “Union leaders need to realize that there are real issues that will need to be addressed with or without a strike.

The union said New Jersey-based Verizon has earned $1.8 billion in profit for each of the first three months of 2016, and criticized what it characterized as excessive compensation for the company’s leadership team.

Nineteen Democratic U.S. senators and Independent Bernie Sanders wrote a letter to Verizon CEO Lowell McAdam last month urging him to reach a deal with the union.

Like many telecommunications companies, Verizon has been hit hard by the shift away from landline phones and is trying to adjust its staffing to meet current needs. The company said the landline portion of its business generates 29% of the company’s revenue but only about 7% of operating income.

“We urge you to act as a responsible corporate citizen and negotiate a fair contract with the employees who make your company’s success possible,” wrote the senators, who all represent East Coast constituencies.

The last contract expired in August. The union said Verizon has reduced staffing by about 40% over the past decade. The company today has about 177,000 workers in 150 countries. It has about 112 million wireless connections, 7 million fiber-optic Internet customers and 5.8 million fiber-optic television customers, the company said.

Source link

Ford unveils $1.2B redevelopment plan for Dearborn offices

0

Ford has an assortment of nearly 70 disconnected buildings along Oakwood Boulevard and many of those buildings are more than 60 years old.

Ford unveiled sweeping plans today to redevelop dozens of buildings in Dearborn that house more than 30,000 employees in a project that will transform the automaker's presence in the city into two distinct campuses over the next 10 years.

The project, which represents an investment estimated at more than $1.2 billion, is intended to give Ford's employees the work environment and technology necessary to design and develop cars of the future.

In some ways, the massive project, in planning for more than three years, is long overdue.

In addition to its headquarters off Michigan Avenue, Ford has an assortment of nearly 70 disconnected buildings along Oakwood Boulevard, and many of those buildings are more than 60 years old. While some are only a few miles from one another, it isn't always easy to get from one building to another.

"For many of our buildings, this is the first true renovation … since they were originally built," said Ford CEO Mark Fields. "Ford World Headquarters was opened in 1956, and 60% of our buildings are more than 50 years old, so this is a very substantial investment for us."

The 10-year redevelopment project will be spearheaded by Ford Land, Ford's real estate management arm, and architectural firm SmithGroupJJR.

"This is more than an investment in new buildings. It’s an investment in our employees," Fields said. "It consolidates our current fragmented footprint, and transforms it into two centralized campuses."

When it's done, the new campus will include a  circular modern building that, according to Ford, will generate more energy than it consumes. All the buildings will be equipped with the latest environmentally friendly technology, such as geothermal heating and cooling and the ability to generate renewable energy from the sun.

"When you look at our research and development center, it will have a lot of green areas that will link buildings with walking trails, bike paths, covered walkways. We will have autonomous vehicles, and on-demand shuttles and ebikes across the campus," Fields said. "It will look like a very modern, forward-thinking company that takes sustainability and the environment very seriously."

Ford declined to say how much it plans to spend on the project or if it will seek assistance from the State of Michigan.

Steve Morris, a real estate broker and managing principal of Axis Advisors in Farmington Hills, said the project easily represents a $1.2-billion investment and reflects the automaker's confidence in its growth.

"It’s a very strong statement about the commitment to community and future of the automobile industry in Michigan," Morris said.

Mark Woods, chief operating officer at real estate brokerage firm Signature Associates, said Ford Land has a well-established track record of serving as a positive force for real estate development in Dearborn.

"This illustrates a commitment to maintaining their properties and keeping Ford relevant," Woods said. Ford Land's mission "never stops. It’s always with a mind-set of, this is Ford’s home, and they will preserve and protect it."

Ford's decision to update its facilities comes a year after General Motors said it will invest $1 billion in its Warren Technical Center and add about 2,600 jobs over the next four years. GM's Tech Center project will include new design studios, a parking deck for design staff and renovation of research and development offices. Toyota is also in the process of developing a new North American headquarters in Plano, Texas, and is moving many of its employees there from Southern California.

Ford's project includes the renovation or construction of more than 7.5 million square feet of work space, studios and labs. About 4.5 million square feet of that space will be either new or renovated space for research and development.

The centerpiece of the Ford product campus will be a new 700,000-square-foot design center that will include new studios and an outdoor design courtyard.

Most of the existing Ford Research and Engineering Center Campus, originally dedicated by U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1953, will be demolished. However, a 14,000-square-foot design showroom that is part of that building will remain intact and will be upgraded to be used as an event venue.

The number of employees in the Ford’s product campus will double from 12,000 to 24,000 as the automaker consolidates its workforce into a more centralized area.

The automaker also plans to update the office space at the Ford World Headquarters building and will build a building for its lending arm, Ford Motor Credit.

Most of the renovations and construction of the new Ford Credit buildings will occur towards the end of the project.

Donna Inch, CEO of Ford Land, said the renovated office space will include a 300% increase in "collaborative work space," or conference rooms and other open meeting areas.

Collaborative, open work environments in which workers are not assigned a specific desk or share space with others has increased in 82% of companies with more than 5,000 employees since 2009, according to a 2015 survey by the International Facility Management Association.

"There is certainly a fairly significant shift occurring in how people use office spaces to achieve specific goals," IFMA spokesman Jed Link said in an interview.

Other key elements of the renovations of the headquarters campus will include:

  • More than 1.3 million square feet of updated work space.
  • Improved connectivity, walkways, covered parking decks and outdoor recreation sites including softball and soccer fields.
  • Enhanced green spaces with planted areas, native species and tree canopy, including a renovation of the Arjay Miller Arboretum started in 1960.

Ford's investment announcement also comes just days after the automaker said it plans to spend $1.6 billion to build a plant to make small cars in Mexico.

Ford took a beating for several days from the UAW, Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump and others on social media for that decision, even though most other automakers are also expanding in Mexico.

"This timing was driven by our decision over three years ago to look at our facilities," Fields said. "The work starts on Wednesday and is not in response to any news or political whims."

Source link

What is being done to tackle tax-dodging?

0

protestorsThe new proposals would mean that multinationals like Starbucks would have to say where in the EU it makes its money and pays its tax

"Tax-dodging" has become a catch-all term for a range of different practices by individuals and companies.

The "Panama Papers" have focused attention on individuals' use of low-tax, low-regulation jurisdictions. But even before that, the public mood was shifting against the strategies that companies use to minimise their tax bills.

The European Commission has now announced its plans to clamp down on corporate practices that are reducing tax bills, as has the OECD. So what reforms are currently in train to tackle the issue?


What is the problem?

Several multinational companies have been in the headlines over tax. In Europe, Starbucks, Amazon, Apple and Fiat have all been investigated by the European Commission, as have many other companies.

The sluggish economic growth and austerity policies that followed the 2008 financial crisis concentrated minds on ways to collect more taxes from global companies making healthy profits.

Critics accuse the wealthy global elite of playing by different rules.  For example, last October it was revealed that in the UK Facebook paid £4,327 ($6,165) in corporation tax in 2014, less than the average tax bill for a UK worker.

Starbucks had sales of £400m in the UK in 2012 but paid no corporation tax at all and Amazon's UK sales of £3.35bn in 2011 led to a "tax expense" of £1.8m.

Other countries have also expressed concerns.


What is being done about it?

Sally Jones, tax director at Deloitte, says "astonishing" progress has been made over the last few years.

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) - a leading economic think-tank - has led the way.

Broadly speaking the OECD's plan tackles three issues.

The first is transfer pricing. New guidelines produced by the OECD make sure that there is a connection between a company's business operations, the amount of value it creates and where it books its profits.

These are not new rules but clarify and improve existing ones and they are considered to be a big step forward. The UK's tax law now refers directly to the OECD guidelines to define transfer pricing.

The second change is country-by-country reporting. This requires companies to report the tax they pay, profits, number of employees and some other key pieces of financial information to the tax authority where they are headquartered.

This information is not released to the public, but tax authorities from other countries can ask to see it. Country-by-country reporting came in for UK-based multi-national companies from January this year.

Thirdly, in order to tackle so-called "sweetheart deals" (arranged on a case-by-case basis between a tax authority and a company) any individually arranged deals will be available to other tax authorities for scrutiny.


What exactly is transfer pricing?

The basic principle is you pay tax where you make your product. But if one part of your company sells a product or service to another part of your company you can shift some of your profits from one (higher-tax) jurisdiction to another (lower-tax) one.

For example the European Commission argues that Starbucks was buying coffee beans from its own Swiss subsidiary at an inflated price. That meant Starbucks in Switzerland (a relatively low-tax country) was making more profits, Starbucks in other European countries were making less.


Do the EU rules go further?

The EU Commission says its proposals - not yet approved by EU governments - build on the OECD reforms.

Big multinationals with annual global revenues above €750m (£599m; $853m) would have to open their accounts to public scrutiny - not just to the tax authorities. That would include giants like Google and Starbucks.

They would have to report their EU profits country-by-country. And for those operating in tax havens - in the Commission's phrase, "jurisdictions that don't abide by international good governance standards on tax" - the same detailed reporting rules would apply.

Some business groups complain that such measures will force companies to reveal commercially sensitive information.

And the EU does not yet have an agreed blacklist of tax havens - though it has pledged to put one in place.

The EU says its proposals would cover about 6,500 businesses and 90% of multinational revenues. The European Network on Debt and Development - campaigning for tax justice - disputes that 90% figure, however.

Transparency International said the proposals fell short of true tax transparency and companies would still be able to avoid public scrutiny outside the EU.


So that's problem solved?

There is significant political will behind the changes, with 31 countries signing up to share country-by-country reports in January.

The G20 leaders and finance ministers have all agreed to the OECD's 15-point plan in principle, including China and the United States.

One international tax expert said it seemed China "fully intends to implement" the proposals, but added they seemed to be "about six months off the pace".  The OECD has been working on new tax rules for over two years

US President Barack Obama's administration and US tax authorities are locked in a battle with Congress over who has the right to implement the changes, with the Republican-dominated legislature resisting as the Obama administration tries to push them through.

But progress is certainly being made.  There has been a change in the way the global tax system works and companies are responding. One tax expert who advises some of Britain's biggest companies said: "It's going to change things massively. I talk to these companies on a daily basis about what they need to do to meet this new standard and they are really taking it seriously.

"They know this is the landscape now. This is the way things are and none of them wants to be the company that ends up on the front page of a newspaper for failing to comply with the rules."

Q&A: Panama Papers scandal


What exactly is "tax-dodging"?

Companies and individuals minimise the amount of tax they pay in numerous ways, some are legal, some are not.

Tax planning: Using rules set by government to do things we're supposed to do is tax planning. It is not just ok, but positively encouraged. That ranges from incentives to save for your retirement, to tax breaks that entice companies to invest.

Tax avoidance is legal but means using tax laws in a way that was not intended when they were written. You're ok by the letter of the law if you're avoiding tax, but you're not playing fair. This casts tax planning as a battle of wits and your own conscience.

Tax evasion Tax evasion is illegal. Evading tax is breaking the law to reduce your tax bill and it is a criminal offense. The UK tax authority - HMRC - says it has taken on an extra 200 investigators since 2010 and it prosecuted 1,165 people for tax evasion in 2014/15, up from just 165 in 2010/11. Tax evasion by companies is quite rare.


Source link

ES Morning Update April 12th 2016

0

41a867d0-7427-402e-b83c-cf3de663e00b

Futures barely inside triangle and nearing the Apex.  Yesterday's brief pierce of the upper falling trendline of that triangle failed as the market dropped back inside it and sold off the last hour of the day.  That was the 4th hit of the upper falling trendline and if it hits it again today it needs to go through or risk a big drop outside of the triangle and down toward the 2000 area in a day or so.

MACD's still making lower highs making multi-negative divergences.  Same thing on other time frames too.

Yesterday I thought we'd ride the upper falling trendline all day and then push through it today to start some bear squeeze higher.  But late in the day the market just dropped quickly hit the lower shorter rising trendline at the close.  This is NOT good for the bulls as it shows a lot of weakness, especially since this morning has barely rose back up much and in doing so it formed a nice bear flag.  If the futures get to the end of the triangle today and don't breakout over the 2050 area odds are going to increase a lot that we'll see a breakdown Wednesday with a downside target in the 2020 area down to 2000 or so within a day or two.

The SPX cash looks very bearish on it's daily chart and that's weighing heavy on the futures now I think.  This is normally a bullish week as it's the monthly option expiration period, and April is also said to be the most bullish month of the year.  But the technical's in the charts DO NOT see anything bullish right now.  I think the best the bulls can do is to just "hold the line" until they are able to get the overbought conditions to at least neutral so they can attempt another rally.  The worst case is they give up the line and that triangle breaks down and the bulls try to regroup around the 2000 level for another rally next week or something.

I'm trying to keep an open mind here and see both the bullish case and the bearish case but the only thing bullish I see is the historical data about the month of April and this option expiration week.  The technical's say we go down.  Yeah, we all know that the market is rigged and SkyNet manipulates the technical's so they fail at critical points, and maybe that's the case here?  I can only tell you what I see and not actually what will happen.  I'd have to be a time traveler to do that... LOL.

Pattern wise I see an MA pattern on the 60 minute futures chart (and the SPX and SPY) that of course is bearish.  The left side of the "A" should be formed on the move up.  The right side of the "A" is normally twice the length of the side of the "M"... so, since the right side of the "M" was made into the close yesterday it peaked at 2056 and hit a low of 2030, or 26 points.  So, you double that number (52 points) and subtract it from the top of the "A" forming at the open today and make your forecast from the highest point of that "A", which could be at the open or the close of the day (if we grind up that shorter rising trendline all day and close right at the Apex of the triangle?)

Elliottwave count is hard as it can be counted many ways.  The bullish count for today would be that we had an ABC down from the 04/04/2016 high of 2071 to the 2026 low on 04/07/2016.  The we started another ABC up and we are in the final C up that could go to 2060 or so on the futures.  The bearish count is that ABC is already finished at yesterday's high and the late sell off into the close yesterday was some kind of wave 1 down with today's slow grind rally up as a wave 2, leaving the wave 3 down for late today or tomorrow morning... which I think is the more likely wave count.  Either way I'm becoming bearish here for the next day or so.

A Yahoo-Daily Mail merger could turn the internet into “the worst kind of tabloid”

0

The company that owns the British tabloid the Daily Mail—and its highly trafficked website—is exploring a potential bid for Yahoo with the help of a private equity backer, the Wall Street Journal reports (paywall). While the Daily Mail & General Trust is just one of dozens of players that may bid for Yahoo, if the company succeeds, news on the internet may never be the same.

Any combination is likely to push the Daily Mail’s trademark brand of incendiary, lightly sourced, heavily borrowed tabloid journalism to Yahoo’s one billion worldwide monthly users. Yahoo’s over 50 local websites, many of them in local languages, help the company draw more total users than any other online company in the world after Google, YouTube, Facebook, and the Chinese search engine Baidu.

The Daily Mail’s high volume of articles, attention-grabbing headlines, and photo-heavy articles have helped it become one of the world’s most-viewed English-language news sites, with more traffic than the New York Times, the Guardian, Huffington Post, and Buzzfeed, according to some measures.

But the company’s numerous critics call it “shameless” and say its model relies heavily on taking other media outlets’ work, printing anonymously sourced gossip, trotting out sexist tropes, and often fanning the flames of religious, racial, and other divides. The company has been the subject of numerous lawsuits in recent years.

After the Daily Mail reported Baria Alamuddin opposed her daughter Amal’s marriage to actor George Clooney because he was not Druze (a Middle Eastern religion) and suggested Amal or Clooney could be killed if they were wed, Clooney responded publicly in USA Today.

The entire story was a fabrication—the elder Ms. Alamuddin is not Druze, nor had she been to Lebanon where the story claimed she was telling friends of her disappointment. But claiming the marriage could result in the death of the bride was another issue:

The irresponsibility, in this day and age, to exploit religious differences where none exist, is at the very least negligent and more appropriately dangerous. We have family members all over the world, and the idea that someone would inflame any part of that world for the sole reason of selling papers should be criminal.

After the Daily Mail apologized and retracted the story, he issued another scathing statement, calling the paper “the worst kind of tabloid” that “makes up its facts” and willingly prints a “premeditated lie.”

In November of last year, the Daily Mail published a cartoon showing refugees and scurrying rats entering Europe. It was compared to Nazi-era propaganda.

2E82312A00000578-3321431-image-a-133_1447721942823-300x213@2x

What DailyMail.com does “goes beyond anything practiced by anything else calling itself a newspaper,” one former writer based in New York wrote on Gawker:

I saw basic journalism standards and ethics casually and routinely ignored. I saw other publications’ work lifted wholesale. I watched editors at the most highly trafficked English-language online newspaper in the world publish information they knew to be inaccurate.

The Daily Mail is suing Gawker for defamation over the piece.

The paper has also been sued by a woman whose photo ran with an article about her being a porn star with HIV (she was neither), as well as by actors Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis.

The DMGT, as the paper’s publicly traded parent company is known, is exploring two options, according to the Wall Street Journal.

  • A private-equity partner buys all of Yahoo’s US operation, and the Mail would take over the news and media parts including Yahoo Finance, Yahoo News, and Yahoo Sports.
  • A private equity partner buys all of Yahoo and merges it with Dailymail.com and EliteDaily.com, the tabloid’s web properties.

DMGT executives have not found a private equity partner yet for any deal, and at this stage are merely in talks with six possible backers, the Journal reported.

Source link

s2Member®